le ven 14-12-2001 à 00:21, George Mitchell a écrit :
> >No it's Aurora the problem. It's incomplete and need more features
> >
> So the plan then is to enable interactive capability in Aurora?
that's it
--
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
-
Russell Hammond: If I die, tell Rolli
Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
>le jeu 13-12-2001 à 17:07, George Mitchell a écrit :
>
>>The problem in my mind is not with Aurora, but with initscripts. This
>>in not a new problem. Aurora has been choking on kudzu for as long as
>>Aurora has been around. The solution is for initscripts to be 'Auro
le jeu 13-12-2001 à 17:07, George Mitchell a écrit :
> The problem in my mind is not with Aurora, but with initscripts. This
> in not a new problem. Aurora has been choking on kudzu for as long as
> Aurora has been around. The solution is for initscripts to be 'Aurora
> aware'. Initscripts
OS wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have mentioned before that Aurora is the wrong way around, but here is
>another example:
>
>initscripts now asks if you wish to scan the disks if the system is not shut
>down correctly (incidently, when I said NO to this the disks were still
>scanned !). However, because
>
> initscripts now asks if you wish to scan the disks if the system is
not shut
> down correctly (incidently, when I said NO to this the disks were
still
> scanned !). However, because Aurora only displays things AFTER the
event
> this
> prompt sits there hidden until it times out and the scan i
