-Original Message-
From: C Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs
>From: Meir Faraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs
>From: Meir Faraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs
>Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:40:12 +0200
>
>On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > Chris Spencer wrote:
> > > Out of curiosity, why is Boc
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> Chris Spencer wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the
> > LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro?
>
> Because plex86 is on the way, and looks like doing some things better? (-:
yeh;-)
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> Yo,
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Meir Faraj wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > > Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the
> > > LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro?
> > >
> > > -Chris
> >
>
Chris Spencer wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL
> by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro?
Because plex86 is on the way, and looks like doing some things better? (-:
--
I wouldn't touch ActiveX with a 10-foot polecat.
I might, however, le
Yo,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Meir Faraj wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL
> > by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro?
> >
> > -Chris
> I think because of plex 86 project that is in work
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL
> by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro?
>
> -Chris
I think because of plex 86 project that is in work this week they was able to
boot and use linux under a virtual machine !!! ;-
