Re: [Cooker] Install issues and XFree86 V4.0 item.

2000-05-01 Thread Pixel
David Aspinall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's track is > > > theinclusion of more than one Windows ( FAT or NTFS ) file > > > system. My system has 3 Windows file systems ( NTFS, FAT, NTFS for > > > VMWare ) and I

Re: [Cooker] Install issues and XFree86 V4.0 item.

2000-05-01 Thread Anton Graham
Submitted 01-May-00 by Randy Welch: | George Lindholm wrote: | > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randy Welch wrote: | > > 1. Nice overall improvement on the installer! | > > | > > 2. But... | > > | > > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's t

Re: [Cooker] Install issues and XFree86 V4.0 item.

2000-05-01 Thread Randy Welch
George Lindholm wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randy Welch wrote: > > 1. Nice overall improvement on the installer! > > > > 2. But... > > > > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's track is > > theinclusion of more than one Wi

RE: [Cooker] Install issues and XFree86 V4.0 item.

2000-05-01 Thread David Aspinall
> > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's track is > > theinclusion of more than one Windows ( FAT or NTFS ) file > > system. My system has 3 Windows file systems ( NTFS, FAT, NTFS for > > VMWare ) and I could not finish the install until I prevented

Re: [Cooker] Install issues and XFree86 V4.0 item.

2000-05-01 Thread Greg Sarsons
Matrox G200 has an invisible pointer with XFree86 v4. Noticed that the G200 when selecting shows up as a 4 meg card as opposed to 8 or 16 megs. > 3. I have G400 and I also have the invisible pointer problem. I'd > really > like to know how to fix that... XFree86 V4 seems to be much fas

RE: [Cooker] Install issues and XFree86 V4.0 item.

2000-05-01 Thread George Lindholm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randy Welch wrote: > 1. Nice overall improvement on the installer! > > 2. But... > > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's track is > theinclusion of more than one Windows ( FAT or NTFS ) file > system