David Aspinall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's track is
> > > theinclusion of more than one Windows ( FAT or NTFS ) file
> > > system. My system has 3 Windows file systems ( NTFS, FAT, NTFS for
> > > VMWare ) and I
Submitted 01-May-00 by Randy Welch:
| George Lindholm wrote:
| >
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randy Welch wrote:
| > > 1. Nice overall improvement on the installer!
| > >
| > > 2. But...
| > >
| > > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's t
George Lindholm wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randy Welch wrote:
> > 1. Nice overall improvement on the installer!
> >
> > 2. But...
> >
> > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's track is
> > theinclusion of more than one Wi
> > One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's track is
> > theinclusion of more than one Windows ( FAT or NTFS ) file
> > system. My system has 3 Windows file systems ( NTFS, FAT, NTFS for
> > VMWare ) and I could not finish the install until I prevented
Matrox G200 has an invisible pointer with XFree86 v4. Noticed that the
G200 when selecting shows up as a 4 meg card as opposed to 8 or 16 megs.
> 3. I have G400 and I also have the invisible pointer problem. I'd
> really
> like to know how to fix that... XFree86 V4 seems to be much fas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randy Welch wrote:
> 1. Nice overall improvement on the installer!
>
> 2. But...
>
> One thing that seems to halt the installation dead in it's track is
> theinclusion of more than one Windows ( FAT or NTFS ) file
> system