Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> No.. as explained by Todd & Andrej, you're just setting up
> clients & servers, no wonder you need client and server stuff.
My complaint is that the installer mishandles this. As I recall, no
user option is provided to install what you call nfs servers in
non-se
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it not be simplest to move exportfs and /etc/exports setup from
> nfs-utils to nfs-utils-client and rename nfs-utils to nfs-utils-server?
No.. as explained by Todd & Andrej, you're just setting up
clients & servers, no wonder you need client and se
> Huh?? Opposite?? Servers are not the only things that want
> to export parts of their file systems. Clients must do so all the
> time to other clients and to servers.
>
> For a server (or another client) to download anything to a client on
> the same LAN, the _CLIENT_ must tell (ie export)
Todd Lyons wrote:
>
> Then that is not a client, it is a server. He's using client/server in
> the context of the services that are running, you are using
> client/server in the context of the physical machine. The basic fact is
> that if machine A is exporting an nfs mount to machine B, then m
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > > 1. The nfs-utils rpm is still not being installed, even though
> > > > nfs-utils-clients is.
> > >
> > > Sounds normal since one is for server us, the other for client
> > > use.
> >
> > Oh dear, this is NOT true.
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 1. The nfs-utils rpm is still not being installed, even though
> > > nfs-utils-clients is.
> >
> > Sounds normal since one is for server us, the other for client
> > use.
>
> Oh dear, this is NOT true. nfs-utils contains all the nfs utils which
>
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Re: Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020307 3:18
> >
> > 1. The nfs-utils rpm is still not being installed, even though
> > nfs-utils-clients is.
>
> Sounds normal since one is for server us, the other for client
> use.
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Re: Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020307 3:18
>
> 1. The nfs-utils rpm is still not being installed, even though
> nfs-utils-clients is.
Sounds normal since one is for server us, the other for client
use.
> 2. Even though the exportfs is set up corr
Can anybody tell me how to get my middle button on my TM Marble
working as a scroll button, as the current CP/M XP driver lets me use
it? It's a very cool feature - but there's insufficient desk space
for a "real" mouse. :)
Jeff DickeySeven Sigma So
Op zo 10-03-2002, om 03:28 schreef Ron Stodden:
> "Liam R. E. Quin" wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 23:48, Ron Stodden wrote:
> > > Netscape navigator and messenger?
>
> > No. Does imwheel achieve that?
>
> For me, imwheel is necessary with Netscape.
>
> --
> Ron. [au]
imwheel is not nec
"Liam R. E. Quin" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 23:48, Ron Stodden wrote:
> > Netscape navigator and messenger?
> No. Does imwheel achieve that?
For me, imwheel is necessary with Netscape.
--
Ron. [au]
÷ ÷ÓË, 10.03.2002, × 01:48, Ron Stodden ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
>
> > I have this in my XF86Config-4 file, and it works -- the
> > mouse wheel scrolls in gnome-terminal, mozilla, konqueror, etc.
>
> Netscape navigator and messenger?
>
netscape 4 is not in mandrake anymore; netscape 6 is mozilla.
-andrej
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 23:48, Ron Stodden wrote:
> "Liam R. E. Quin" wrote:
> [imwheel] is an RPM distributed with all Mandrake 8 releases. A kpackage
> search
> will show whether it is installed.
$ rpm -q imwheel
package imwheel is not installed
$ rpm -qa | grep -i imwheel
$
I have not done a
"Liam R. E. Quin" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 12:12, Ron Stodden wrote:
> > I said imwheel is necessary with XFree86-4. That is a true statement
> > here.
>
> possibly; I'm not sure what "imwheel" is, but if it's a program I'm not
> running it.
It is an RPM distributed with all Mandrak
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 12:12, Ron Stodden wrote:
> I said imwheel is necessary with XFree86-4. That is a true statement
> here.
possibly; I'm not sure what "imwheel" is, but if it's a program I'm not
running it. I have this in my XF86Config-4 file, and it works -- the
mouse wheel scrolls in gno
Ron Stodden wrote:
>
> Curtis H wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 03:12, Ron Stodden wrote:
>
> > > I said imwheel is necessary with XFree86-4. That is a true statement
> > > here.
> >
> > What kind of wheel mouse do you have?
> >
> > I have an Intellimouse and when I last did a clean insta
Curtis H wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 03:12, Ron Stodden wrote:
> > I said imwheel is necessary with XFree86-4. That is a true statement
> > here.
>
> What kind of wheel mouse do you have?
>
> I have an Intellimouse and when I last did a clean install (around
> beta2), I had to delete an
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 03:12, Ron Stodden wrote:
> Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> >
> > ÷ óÂÔ, 09.03.2002, × 06:18, Ron Stodden ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> > > 7. Despite a wheel mouse being indicated and tested, the necessary
> > > imwheel RPM is not being installed. The wheel therefore remains
> > > inoperative.
>
Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
>
> ÷ óÂÔ, 09.03.2002, × 06:18, Ron Stodden ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> > 7. Despite a wheel mouse being indicated and tested, the necessary
> > imwheel RPM is not being installed. The wheel therefore remains
> > inoperative.
>
> Imwheel is not needed at least with XFree86-4 and actuall
÷ óÂÔ, 09.03.2002, × 06:18, Ron Stodden ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> 7. Despite a wheel mouse being indicated and tested, the necessary
> imwheel RPM is not being installed. The wheel therefore remains
> inoperative.
Imwheel is not needed at least with XFree86-4 and actually when it is
started wheel in KDE wo
On Sat, 09 Mar 2002 14:18:34 +1100
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020307 3:18
>
...
>
> 7. Despite a wheel mouse being indicated and tested, the necessary
> imwheel RPM is not being installed. The wheel therefore remains
> inoperative.
> Once im
21 matches
Mail list logo
