OK. You can of course do that. Didn't consider that option. The only
drawback, though, is that ACPI bloats the kernel by 120K.
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets precedence over APM :-(
(ACPI is not available as a module).
Have
OK. You can of course do that. Didn't consider that option. The only
drawback, though, is that ACPI bloats the kernel by 120K.
Is it a joke? 128MB was not enough to run KDE normally - I could only
hear my HD swapping. And you care about 120K? Of course, I do not
suggest including it into
So sprach »Tom Berger« am 2001-08-23 um 13:41:37 +0200 :
But you can choose not to run KDE. That's a bit different, don't you
think?
Theoretically, yes. But with 32 MB of RAM, I don't think that 120k are
that much after all.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german)
On Aug 23 2001, 15:11 +, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
OK. You can of course do that. Didn't consider that option. The only
drawback, though, is that ACPI bloats the kernel by 120K.
Is it a joke? 128MB was not enough to run KDE normally - I could only
hear my HD swapping. And you
On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Chris Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's a new acpid:
well that doen't change anything since we don't use acpid
well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self.
Chris Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's a new acpid:
well that doen't change anything since we don't use acpid
Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us
choose which module to use?
--- Eivind Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Chris Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's a new acpid:
well that doen't change anything since we don't
use acpid
No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets precedence over APM :-(
(ACPI is not available as a module).
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us
choose which module to use?
--- Eivind Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22 Aug 2001,
Is there not a script that you could create to allow
for the choice between the two? Make it part of the
install script and part of mcc?
--- Eivind Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets
precedence over APM :-(
(ACPI is not available as a module).
No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets precedence over APM :-(
(ACPI is not available as a module).
Have you really tested it? I did and it works. If you compile in both
and specify noacpi command-line kernel option ACPI is not started. And
(I have currently no kernel sources) I bet
10 matches
Mail list logo
