On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 18:07:15 +0300
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It does not matter. What matters is that kernel-source-our-weird-name
> does not Require: kernel-headers any more (it never needed it actually).
> -andrej
>
Thanks, for the clarification.
I can at times be s
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I Was aware of that, but I also noted that kernel-headers-2.4.16-16mdk
> still exists as a seperate pkg.
yes it is, but notica bene that :
kernel-headers need_to_be with_the_one_compiled_with_glibc
that the whole point of the split.
--
http://w
> I Was aware of that, but I also noted that kernel-headers-2.4.16-16mdk
> still exists as a seperate pkg.
>
It does not matter. What matters is that kernel-source-our-weird-name
does not Require: kernel-headers any more (it never needed it actually).
Thus you can have as many kernel-sources a
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:05:29 +0300
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For it to serve any purpose if we can now install multiple
> kernel-sources
> > do we not also need to be able to install multiple kernel-headers.
> >
>
> May I ask you to review cooker archives for the past t
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do not mean that they are installed in the same directory (no more the
> case). I mean urpmi does rpm -U that removes old version.
Yes, I have checked directory structure, kernel source will no longer be
automatically selected (probably) by --auto
> For it to serve any purpose if we can now install multiple
kernel-sources
> do we not also need to be able to install multiple kernel-headers.
>
May I ask you to review cooker archives for the past three weeks?
rpm -q --changelog glibc
* Wed Nov 21 2001 Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:04:27 +0300
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > borsenkow> and, please, add kernel-source to /etc/urpmi/inst.list
> > >
> > > fpons?
> >
> > I can add it, but this will no more be upgradable (unable to be
> selected,
> > except
> > by explicit require on vers
>
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, many people requested the ability to have multiple
kernel-sources
> > installed. I just do not like when urpmi --auto-select overwrites
> > kernel-source.
>
> People are making the specs we use...
>
I do not mean that they are insta
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, many people requested the ability to have multiple kernel-sources
> installed. I just do not like when urpmi --auto-select overwrites
> kernel-source.
People are making the specs we use...
François.
> > borsenkow> and, please, add kernel-source to /etc/urpmi/inst.list
> >
> > fpons?
>
> I can add it, but this will no more be upgradable (unable to be
selected,
> except
> by explicit require on version and release ?).
>
With new scheme it is not upgradeable anyway - you always have a unique
Juan Quintela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> borsenkow> and, please, add kernel-source to /etc/urpmi/inst.list
>
> fpons?
I can add it, but this will no more be upgradable (unable to be selected, except
by explicit require on version and release ?).
François.
> "borsenkow" == Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
borsenkow> {pts/2}% rpm -q --whatprovides kernel-source
borsenkow> kernel-source-2.4.13-12mdk
borsenkow> {pts/2}% rpm -q --provides kernel-source-2.4.16.4mdk-1-1mdk
borsenkow> alsa-source
borsenkow> kernel-source-2.4.16.4mdk = 1-1m
>
> {pts/2}% rpm -q --whatprovides kernel-source
> kernel-source-2.4.13-12mdk
> {pts/2}% rpm -q --provides kernel-source-2.4.16.4mdk-1-1mdk
> alsa-source
> kernel-source-2.4.16.4mdk = 1-1mdk
>
> please add correct provides
>
> and, please, add kernel-source to /etc/urpmi/inst.list
>
Even mor
13 matches
Mail list logo
