Op do 31-01-2002, om 12:10 schreef Neuromancer:
>
> Yep. I wonder why they decided on that?
>
> -Russ
Windows uses also 16 colors(don't know the size at the to of my head).
This makes it almost certain to work
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 11:06:36AM +0100, François Pons wrote:
> Look at /boot/lilo, where does it points ? Do you have modified it by hand ?
> (possible values are currently lilo-text, lilo-graphic, lilo-menu, lilo-bmp).
Argh, oups, shame on me: you were right: I don't know how it happens,
lilo
>
> But really, don't you think 640x480 (or even 800x600) in 256 colors is
not
> better ?
>
As Mandrake managed to prove it depends :-)
Neuromancer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus spake François Pons about Life, the Universe, and Everything:
> | Look at /boot/lilo, where does it points ? Do you have modified it by hand ?
> | (possible values are currently lilo-text, lilo-graphic, lilo-menu, lilo-bmp).
>
> Out of curiosity, wh
Gregoire Favre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > if that is the case, re-install lilo cleanly (eg: rpm -i lilo-22*.rpm --force)
> > and it should work.
>
> No: rpm -i lilo-22.1-4mdk.i586.rpm --force
> lilo
> Fatal: First boot sector is version 21.7. Expecting version 22.1.
> rpm -e lilo and then r
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:23:39AM +0100, Pixel wrote:
> > Fatal: First boot sector is version 21.7. Expecting version 22.1.
>
> i'd say you have a seperate /boot where there is an old /boot/boot.b, whereas
> /sbin/lilo is more up to date
Yep:
rpm -V lilo gives:
.M.. g /boot/lilo
Exit 1
>
Gregoire Favre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> and lilo
> 29.01 22:02
> Fatal: First boot sector is version 21.7. Expecting version 22.1.
i'd say you have a seperate /boot where there is an old /boot/boot.b, whereas
/sbin/lilo is more up to date
try "rpm -V lilo" to verify that things are weird.
