Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am also experiencing this too. Most of my music is in Ogg Vorbis
> format though. I noticed this last week because after playing music at
> work all day X was using over 80% of my system's memory (256 MB). Now
> today I wasn't playing music until I read t
"Vincent Meyer, MD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed this over the weekend. When using XMMS to play MP3s after 5-10
> minutes the machine would hard freeze. This morning I decided to do a little
> digging to see if I could find out why.
>
> Running top in a consol
le mer 13-02-2002 à 01:50, Sergio Korlowsky a écrit :
>
>
> I have reported this several times, still no one (@Mandrake) mentioning
> anything about it... That is serious! ;-)
>
> I just upgraded packages to reflect latest Beta-2 and still have this problem.
>
> Right after turning on X usi
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > >>32MB if I'm not mistaken; can check on Monday.
> > >>
> > > So the ramdisk should never start, it checks for 52Mb before start. Did
> > > you hack it or something?
> > >
> >
> >
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >>32MB if I'm not mistaken; can check on Monday.
> >>
> > So the ramdisk should never start, it checks for 52Mb before start. Did
> > you hack it or something?
> >
>
> No. I used hd.img and 'reascue expert' at boot prompt, it asked me about
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>On 28 Jul 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>
>guillaume> What's that? In what (exact) situation do you get signal 15
>guillaume>
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28 Jul 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > guillaume> What's that? In what (exact) situation do you get signal 15
> > > > guillaume> while loading ramdisk?
> > > > Inq
On 28 Jul 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > > guillaume> What's that? In what (exact) situation do you get signal 15
> > > guillaume> while loading ramdisk?
> > > Inquiring minds also want to know.
> > >
> >
> >
> > When it loads RA
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > guillaume> What's that? In what (exact) situation do you get signal 15
> > guillaume> while loading ramdisk?
> > Inquiring minds also want to know.
> >
>
>
> When it loads RAM disk with stage2. Somewhere near the end I get the above
> mes
Juan Quintela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "guillaume" == Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> guillaume> What I tried to explain, is that with a ~ 20 Mbytes rescue
> guillaume> system, we have two choices:
>
> guillaume> - upload it to memory and mount it from he
Juan Quintela wrote:
>>"guillaume" == Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> Hi
>
> guillaume> What I tried to explain, is that with a ~ 20 Mbytes rescue
> guillaume> system, we have two choices:
>
> guillaume> - upload it to memory and mount it from here (ramdisk)
> g
> "guillaume" == Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi
guillaume> What I tried to explain, is that with a ~ 20 Mbytes rescue
guillaume> system, we have two choices:
guillaume> - upload it to memory and mount it from here (ramdisk)
guillaume> - copy it to a disk/partition and m
> > So you mean we need writable root in rescue mode? Good, it means, that
> > people with 32MB of memory can not use rescue anymore. Very nice.
>
> You flame but you don't understand.
>
I do not flame. I just summarize the current state. And I do not understand
what I do not understand.
> >
> >
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > FYI, the rescue is a small system, located in memory and mounted as a
> > ramdisk.
> >
>
> It has exactly the same size as stage2:
>
> [root@test base]# ll
> total 47788
> ...
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 9900324 Jul 19 19:23 mdkinst_
>
> FYI, the rescue is a small system, located in memory and mounted as a
> ramdisk.
>
It has exactly the same size as stage2:
[root@test base]# ll
total 47788
...
-rw-r--r--1 root root 9900324 Jul 19 19:23 mdkinst_stage2.bz2
...
-rw-r--r--1 root root 9354815 Jul 19 19:
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just played with rescue mode. This is just resynced cooker. I boot with
> hd.img using 'rescue expert'. System has 32MB, it tries to load second stage
> RAM disk and aborts with "low memory" at some point.
>
> I thought, it should not do RAM di
Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> Thank you.
> What changes are there in this kernel.
> Is there more to it than:"""
> rpm -Uvh ..kernel-enterprise-2.4.3-20mdk.i586.rpm
> vi /etc/lilo.conf
> lilo
> """?
no, should do the trick..
Hi.
Thank you.
What changes are there in this kernel.
Is there more to it than:"""
rpm -Uvh ..kernel-enterprise-2.4.3-20mdk.i586.rpm
vi /etc/lilo.conf
lilo
"""?
onsdag 25. april 2001 21:38, skrev Chmouel Boudjnah:
> Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Using st
Hi.
I found the config file, so just wondering if there are any patches not in
the vanilla kernel present. Else I see how it is configured.
Also the upgrade went smoothly. Thank you.
I now have all the memory I need.
torsdag 26. april 2001 00:35, skrev Jørgen Hermanrud Fjeld:
> Hi.
>
> Thank y
"Scot Ballard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Sidenote:
>
> Redhat 6.2 and SuSE 6.4 both work fine without special lilo inserts.
redhat and suse may use lilo and mandrake grub -- try lilo on mandrake to
get same results.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeS
Tim McKenzie wrote:
> > I have one the original Athlon motherboards from FIC with an Athlon 700
> and
> > 128mb of ram.
> >
> > PROBLEM:
> >
> > Since Mandrake 7.1 I only get 64mb of ram. Durring the install it doesnt
> > pickup the 128 even when i insert it during the lilo configuration
> I have one the original Athlon motherboards from FIC with an Athlon 700
and
> 128mb of ram.
>
> PROBLEM:
>
> Since Mandrake 7.1 I only get 64mb of ram. Durring the install it doesnt
> pickup the 128 even when i insert it during the lilo configuration portion
> of setup.
>
---
I
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a new beta will be out soon with a new kernel that will hopefully be more
> stable. otherwise, you can try cooker :)
Yup currenly spending my full week on the kernel...
--
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
Paris, France
"Cranford, Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pixel,
>
> I also tried to install 7.1 via network.img and it bombed out with the same
> error, and im not the only one. If you goto deja news and look up this error
> you will see there are many people who have run into this error on 7.0 and
> 7.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Memory issues in Ulysses
"Cranford, Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greetings,
>
> I can get Ulysses to get as far as installing all the pkgs but as soon as
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Memory issues in Ulysses
Hi
I have the same problem using an emachine with a 366 cyrix and also on my
233AMD K6. I had no problems installing 7.1
yet I could not use DSL with it I try using this version and I got more
problems than what I originally started with
"Cranford, Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greetings,
>
> I can get Ulysses to get as far as installing all the pkgs but as soon as it
> starts post-install configure it crashes with a lost memory error as system
> comes crashing down
> error. Has anyone else seen this??? I have run memory
Hi
I have the same problem using an emachine with a 366 cyrix and also on my
233AMD K6. I had no problems installing 7.1
yet I could not use DSL with it I try using this version and I got more
problems than what I originally started with
- Original Message -
From: "Cranford, Donald" <[E
Pixel
Thank you very much! I added the mem= option to my menu.lst file at it worked
great!
Thank you again!
Danny
>
> excerpt from my /boot/grub/menu.lst:
>
> title linux
> kernel (hd0,0)/boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/hda1 mem=128M
>
> cu Pixel.
Danny Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
> I just installed 7.1 on a newer computer and it does not detect my correct
> memory (256mb) It is showing only 64 mb. Windoze correctly detected the correct
> amount. I am pretty sure I typed in the correct value at installation.
>
> >From wh
Yep that did it.
thanx
dave
Been getting a floppy drive error will copy the exact error and post it
asap It says something about HDD says two sizes something like 100061603
and 0 I dont use my floppy drive for anything other than an install boot
disk will post it as soon as i can trap t
Install LILO, remove grub.
-David Talbot
At 06:36 PM 6/2/00 +0100, you wrote:
>beta 3 only shows my system having 64megs it has 128 how do i fix this?
>
>dave
beta 3 only shows my system having 64megs it has 128 how do i fix this?
dave
Gary,
You know, I tried that and I don't think it set the boot installer up
right. Don't remember though.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Gary Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] memory
Actually, it w
Amen to the BP6 and "buggy" Bios.
The latest release "PW" caused a Kernel panic, and a reflash back to "NJ"
- Original Message -
From: "Chmouel Boudjnah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000
Mandrake 6.1 picked it up perfectly.
- Original Message -
From: "Pixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] memory error
> "TRUB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
"TRUB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Abit BP6, 224m Ram.
> Oxygen installed reports 64m memory?
it is what the kernel detects. correct it!
was it ever detected nicely 224M?
37 matches
Mail list logo
