On ðÔÎ, 2002-01-18 at 18:53, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> > Not quite true. It pulls such things like XFree86-libs (and more).
>
> where ? look at requires : only rpm, perl an bash stuff. Maybe you mix
> urpmi and gurpmi/rpmdrake
>
Actually it was snf-en that pulled in XFree86.
Retracted
-andrej
François Pons wrote:
> Frederic Corne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I remember a minimum install of debian potatoe is about 90Mo for a very basic
>>networked workstation (only terminal , no X stuff) with a ssh server.
>>
>>Currently wiht the mdk installer , the minimum I have found is about
Frederic Corne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I remember a minimum install of debian potatoe is about 90Mo for a very basic
> networked workstation (only terminal , no X stuff) with a ssh server.
>
> Currently wiht the mdk installer , the minimum I have found is about 150-170Mo.
>
> This is not
BTW where is last urpmi rpm ? I don't find it on the french mirors
FC
Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
>
> true, it's like debian. Install the minimum and apt-get what u want.
I remember a minimum install of debian potatoe is about 90Mo for a very
basic networked workstation (only terminal , no X stuff) with a ssh server.
Currently wiht the mdk installer , the minimum I
le ven 18-01-2002 à 15:50, Borsenkow Andrej a écrit :
>
> >
> > true, it's like debian. Install the minimum and apt-get what u want.
>
> Urpmi is not minimum
to me yes ;)
see the case of post minimal install upgrade/rpm installation
> > So install the minimum and urpmi what I want instead of
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [will@bastard dir_test]$ rpm -q --requires urpmi
> > eject
> > webfetch
> > perl-DateManip >= 5.40
We need a replacement for perl-DateManip which do not require perl (but only
perl-base), currently we have to increase perl to make perl-DateManip r
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not quite true. It pulls such things like XFree86-libs (and more). To
> support such minimal installs we need to split urpmi into urpmi-base,
> urpmi-text, urpmi-x. Or possibly two urpmi-text and urpmi-gui.
there's already urpmi and gurpmi.
AFAIK u
>
> true, it's like debian. Install the minimum and apt-get what u want.
Urpmi is not minimum
> So install the minimum and urpmi what I want instead of having to deal
> by hand with the package I may want to add. For example I do a minimal
> install and after I urpmi apache and all apache rela
le jeu 17-01-2002 à 16:36, Murray Root a écrit :
>
> Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I like the idea about "You have not chosen any package collections
> > -
> > > would you like 1. a minimal install, 2. no X, "
> > > However,
>
> I like the idea about "You have not chosen any package collections -
> would you like 1. a minimal install, 2. no X, "
> However, "urpmi" should be part of "minimal" ..
>
It depends. For a mission critical system (like firewall) you may not
want to install anything except what is absolu
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I like the idea about "You have not chosen any package collections
> -
> > would you like 1. a minimal install, 2. no X, "
> > However, "urpmi" should be part of "minimal" ..
>
> hmff :-(
>
> here w
Christian Bricart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I like the idea about "You have not chosen any package collections -
> would you like 1. a minimal install, 2. no X, "
> However, "urpmi" should be part of "minimal" ..
hmff :-(
here we go, what's the definition of minimal...
13 matches
Mail list logo
