"B. K. Barley" écrivit :
> Personally, I find that 9.0 is highly stable and very useable. In fact, I
> always install this version. Has several features that 8.10 does not.
So, ask author to make a stable release. We are in freeze. I'll upload
(maybe, if it is really stable) a 0.9 version _AFT
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 05:05:46PM -0400, B. K. Barley wrote:
> Personally, I find that 9.0 is highly stable and very useable. In fact, I
> always install this version. Has several features that 8.10 does not.
>
> Anyway, that's my 1.5 cents (deflation ya know).
Point is some people find the 2
Joakim Bodin a écrit :
> Ben Reser wrote:
>
> > No it doesn't. If you go look at the site. The latest *STABLE* release is
> > 0.8.10. Which is what Mandrake has in it. 0.9 (per normal Linux style
> > versioning) is a development version and shouldn't be considered stable or
> > usable.
> >
>
Ben Reser wrote:
> No it doesn't. If you go look at the site. The latest *STABLE* release is
> 0.8.10. Which is what Mandrake has in it. 0.9 (per normal Linux style
> versioning) is a development version and shouldn't be considered stable or
> usable.
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 05:39:26PM +0
f Ben Reser
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] old Eterm in Linux-Mandrake
No it doesn't. If you go look at the site. The latest *STABLE* release is
0.8.10. Which is what Mandrake has in it. 0.9 (per normal Linux style
versioning) is a d
No it doesn't. If you go look at the site. The latest *STABLE* release is
0.8.10. Which is what Mandrake has in it. 0.9 (per normal Linux style
versioning) is a development version and shouldn't be considered stable or
usable.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 05:39:26PM +0200, Joakim Bodin wrote:
> I'
