Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-28 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Jan 27, 11:31am, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: } Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches } } On ÷ÓË, 2002-01-27 at 01:18, Liam Quin wrote: } > Does anyone have completion that uses colour (like ls) and/or } > bold, to indicate the prefix you have already typed, in matches? Zsh emits

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-28 Thread Han
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ainsi parlait Han : > > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Well, that was only a first quick try :-) I'll try harder. > > > > I included you're urpmi completion as well. But if you tried with more > > succes ;) please lemme know, and I w

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-28 Thread Han
Han ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Ainsi parlait Han : > > > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Well, that was only a first quick try :-) I'll try harder. > > > > > > I included you're urpmi completion as well. But if you tried with mo

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-28 Thread Han
Chmouel Boudjnah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on > > this one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on > > this ;) > > Pardon ? Yes I forgive you. Groetjes, Han. -- http://w

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-28 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Han : > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Well, that was only a first quick try :-) I'll try harder. > > I included you're urpmi completion as well. But if you tried with more > succes ;) please lemme know, and I will bake a -4mdk. Here is a better one, tough still not

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-28 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this > one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;) Pardon ? -- http://www.chmouel.org/

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-27 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
On ÷ÓË, 2002-01-27 at 01:18, Liam Quin wrote: > Does anyone have completion that uses colour (like ls) and/or > bold, to indicate the prefix you have already typed, in matches? > > I had a go at doing that with zsh a while ago, interactions between the > output fo the scripts and the fomatting in

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Han
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Well, that was only a first quick try :-) I'll try harder. I included you're urpmi completion as well. But if you tried with more succes ;) please lemme know, and I will bake a -4mdk. http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/bash-2.05a-3mdk.src.rpm Gro

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Liam Quin
Does anyone have completion that uses colour (like ls) and/or bold, to indicate the prefix you have already typed, in matches? I had a go at doing that with zsh a while ago, interactions between the output fo the scripts and the fomatting into columns made it hard. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Core

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Han
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ainsi parlait Goetz Waschk : > > Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2002, 03:16:19 Uhr MET, schrieb Han: > > > I have been using the completion patches for a while now and > > > sometimes it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For > > > example: > > >

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Goetz Waschk : > Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2002, 03:16:19 Uhr MET, schrieb Han: > > I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes > > it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example: > > > > cd-ing into a dir with spaces. > > rpm -ba --clean f[tab

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Goetz Waschk
Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2002, 03:16:19 Uhr MET, schrieb Han: > I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes > it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example: > > cd-ing into a dir with spaces. > rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not find foo.spec > man d[tab] sh

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Borsenkow Andrej : > On ðÔÎ, 2002-01-25 at 20:31, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : > > > Ainsi parlait Han : > > > > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into > > > > > official

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Han
Yves Duret ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have been using the completion patches for a while now and > > sometimes it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For > > example: > > > > cd-ing into a dir with spaces. rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not fin

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Yves Duret
Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes > it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example: > > cd-ing into a dir with spaces. > rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not find foo.spec > man d[tab] shows all manpages with a d b

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Roger
On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 05:50, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > And you call *that* completion?! :-) Here is what I call completion: > > {pts/3}% urpmi -aTAB > {pts/3}% urpmi --allow-medium-change > Completing option > --allow-medium-change -- allow change of removable media > --auto-- do

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-26 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
On ðÔÎ, 2002-01-25 at 20:31, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : > > Ainsi parlait Han : > > > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into > > > > official mandrake bash package, or "not until they are

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-25 Thread Han
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : > > Ainsi parlait Han : > > > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Could the patches proposed here about completion be included > > > > into official mandrake bash package, or "not until they are > > > >

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-25 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse : > Ainsi parlait Han : > > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into > > > official mandrake bash package, or "not until they are accepted by > > > bash developpers" ? http://www.caliban.org/

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-25 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Han : > Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into > > official mandrake bash package, or "not until they are accepted by > > bash developpers" ? http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml > > Check the rpm package

Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches

2002-01-25 Thread Han
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into > official mandrake bash package, or "not until they are accepted by > bash developpers" ? http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml Check the rpm package in my url ;) Groetjes, Han. --