Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But still, aliases should be moved to /etc/profile.d/alias.sh or somesuch.
yep i plan to go back to this..
So sprach Andrej Borsenkow am Sun, May 20, 2001 at 08:30:41PM +0400:
> About zsh? Wow! :-)
>
> Have you ever tested it?
Uhm, yes, but somehow my tests were bad (ie. gave false positives).
I'm sorry for accusing you, as you are and were completely right. Now I
tested some more and found out exa
Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Andrej Borsenkow am Sun, May 20, 2001 at 03:51:29PM +0400:
>
>>>Why has LESSOPEN been moved to /etc/skel/.bash_alias ? Before it was in
>>>/etc/profile which also allowed other shells, namely zsh,
>>>
>>Sorry? Zsh never reads /etc/profile if called as zsh. It
So sprach Andrej Borsenkow am Sun, May 20, 2001 at 03:51:29PM +0400:
> >
> > Why has LESSOPEN been moved to /etc/skel/.bash_alias ? Before it was in
> > /etc/profile which also allowed other shells, namely zsh,
>
> Sorry? Zsh never reads /etc/profile if called as zsh. It reads
> /etc/zprofile.
>
> Why has LESSOPEN been moved to /etc/skel/.bash_alias ? Before it was in
> /etc/profile which also allowed other shells, namely zsh,
Sorry? Zsh never reads /etc/profile if called as zsh. It reads
/etc/zprofile.
I think, that we just need something like /etc/profile.d/alias.sh, because
/etc/p
