On Tue, 28 May 2002, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
* Rejected requested for enhancement:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4687814.html
Not that I want to claim to know anything about JAVA, but maybe we can
convince IBM or blackdown to compile their JREs with gcc 3.1?
--- Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
schrieb: On Wed, 29 May 2002, Borsenkow Andrej
wrote:
So you mean it _is_ possible to build Java with
3.1?
Yes.
Then what the hell, let's release PLF package for
it.
No, you can't.
why ?
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 2:47 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
* Rejected requested for enhancement:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4687814.html
Not that I want to claim to know anything about JAVA, but maybe we can
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 4:56 pm, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and still
java
is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next.
Huh, where did you find rc2.4mdk? Latest is rc2.2mdk and rc2.3mdk will
probably go in
Am Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2002 20:25 schrieb nDiScReEt:
How is it that konqueror works still with java but not mozilla? What makes
mozilla so differnet? Anybody know or have a clue?
AFAIK konqy calls the java binary and does not link the java plugin (as
mozilla does)
Alexander
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:13:57PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote:
I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and still java
is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next.
With a signature like that you'll be very lucky if anyone bothers to pay
any attention to you.
Hi,
I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and still
java
is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next.
Huh, where did you find rc2.4mdk? Latest is rc2.2mdk and rc2.3mdk will
probably go in with a fix for building mozilla with gcc3.1 on PPC.
The Java
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 4:42 pm, Ben Reser wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 04:13:57PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote:
I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and still
java is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next.
With a signature like that you'll be very
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:12:17PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote:
My signature is a program that uses fortune. That last signature is a
by-product of that script in action. My apologies.
My sig is also generated by fortune... you want to make sure you use the
-s option to say only short foruntes
On Tuesday 28 May 2002 6:35 pm, Ryan T. Sammartino wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:12:17PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote:
My signature is a program that uses fortune. That last signature is a
by-product of that script in action. My apologies.
My sig is also generated by fortune... you want to
I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and
still
java
is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next.
Huh, where did you find rc2.4mdk? Latest is rc2.2mdk and rc2.3mdk will
probably go in with a fix for building mozilla with gcc3.1 on PPC.
The
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 12:08 am, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
I build the rpm source package mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.4mdk.src.rpm and
still
java
is broken. I will try a tarball and see if that works next.
Huh, where did you find rc2.4mdk? Latest is rc2.2mdk and rc2.3mdk will
probably go
12 matches
Mail list logo
