Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Found stupid problem, this will be fixed in -25mdk.
Upgraded to -25mdk and it is working fine again. Thanks.
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
says: overflow.
Found stupid problem, this will be fixed in -25mdk.
I have now installed -25mdk, and it works!
-- Bjarne
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 10:07, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
måndagen den 10 november 2003 20.34 skrev Bjarne Thomsen:
I have now installed -25mdk, and it works!
-- Bjarne
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 10:07, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the
mdk9.2
2.4.22-25mdkenterprise
No more mount problem for
/dev/sda5 / ext3
had kernel panic since 2.4.22-22mdkenterprise
Bjarne
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 20:35, Oden Eriksson wrote:
måndagen den 10 november 2003 20.34 skrev Bjarne Thomsen:
I have now installed -25mdk, and it works!
-- Bjarne
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 01:07, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jure Repinc wrote:
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
says: overflow.
Found stupid problem, this will be
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kernel-desktop can have all the preempt stuff and other things (setpcap?)
you do not want to have on your server.
actually capabilities are exactly for server for all I can say. It allows you
to run services with reduced privileges
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kernel-desktop can have all the preempt stuff and other things (setpcap?)
you do not want to have on your server.
actually capabilities are exactly for server for all I can say. It
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Please try .test3 kernel on a UP system. I think you really should get a
message about partition table consistency checks failure and a reason
in parenthesis (when determining disk partitions).
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
And BTW, do you happen
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 15:21, Jure Repinc wrote:
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Please try .test3 kernel on a UP system. I think you really should get a
message about partition table consistency checks failure and a reason
in parenthesis (when determining disk partitions).
Hi,
I have tried with kernel -24mdk and still the same problem. I did get
the partition table consistency check message and in paranthesis it
says: overflow.
Thanks, I now have something to work on. It could be that start_sec
nr_sects values are signed (but I can't find this on the specs) so
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Olivier Blin wrote:
Wow. I eat my words.
Test9.4mdk kicks ass. All modules load (alsa, firewire, USB, video,
even joystick!!!) This is very cool.
thanks to svetljo, he told me how to fix it
Responsiveness is insane. Like even my mouse cursor moves faster. Is
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Any news about the 23mdk panic?
Sorry, we tried many configurations to no avail. :-( i.e. it still works.
Among others things, tried with an xfs /boot, reiserfs /, ext3 /home, it
works. Tried a 2 disks configuration: first disk with some ntfs garbage,
Tim Sawchuck wrote:
[..]
I have something going on with sound from xmms playing oggs, but I am not
sure it is the 2.6 kernel. I have it with the 2.4 kernel, but rarely, and
seems more frequent with 2.6. I seem to notice a chopping or clipping or
skips, but there is no pattern I can find.
Have
Jure Repinc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
k Quel Qun wrote:
reiserfs seems to be borked.
I also get kernel panic with harddrive which has 3 partitions on it:
swap, ext3 and ntfs. So it is not just reiserfs. Worked just fine with
-19mdk kernel.
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 00:07:19 -0500
Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 00:02, Olivier Blin wrote:
Your problem has been reported here :
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09733.html
Enh... probably best to let them fix it. There
On 11/05/2003 09:08:19 AM, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
Have you considered this?
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg129204.html
GNOME users need not worry about this oddity.
Or about arts (huge sigh of relief).
Austin
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:08:19 -0800
Rolf Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
Tim Sawchuck wrote:
[..]
I have something going on with sound from xmms playing oggs, but I am
not sure it is the 2.6 kernel. I have it with the 2.4 kernel, but
rarely, and seems more
I have tried kernel-2.4.22.24mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
on a PC with IDE ext3 root partition.
I get this error from mount:
hda5: bad access: block=2, count=2
then I get bad superblock and more errors.
I use a ram disk, as I have a SCSI CD writer.
On another PC with a SCSI HD I also get
a mount error of a
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 05:14, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
Any news about the 23mdk panic?
Sorry, we tried many configurations to no avail. :-( i.e. it still works.
Among others things, tried with an xfs /boot, reiserfs /, ext3 /home, it
works.
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 08:49, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
There is more power in your music than you know - is this the music hath
charms to sooth a savage beast thing going here?!?!?
Since I'm on a correcting-colloquialisms kick on this list...:)
That's a misquote. The original is: Music hath charms
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 23:38:30 +
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 08:49, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
There is more power in your music than you know - is this the music
hath charms to sooth a savage beast thing going here?!?!?
Since I'm
Any news about the 23mdk panic?
I tried again with the same result.
I noted
Loading jdb.o
Loading ext3.o
before the mount error 6.
-- Bjarne
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 08:54, Bjarne Thomsen wrote:
I forgot to mention that I tried the
kernel-enterprise-2.4.22.23mdk
kernel. All enterprise kernels
I have the same problem with 23mdk, and the last tmb kernel.
Doesn't work with reiserfs... kernel panic, can't find init.
Works fine with XFS or ext3.
Austin
I have the same problem with 23mdk, and the last tmb kernel.
Doesn't work with reiserfs... kernel panic, can't find init.
Works fine with XFS or ext3.
Austin
Hum, try 2.6 :)
It must have all the features you need, except bootsplash ;)
--
Olivier Blin
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:32, Olivier Blin wrote:
Hum, try 2.6 :)
It must have all the features you need, except bootsplash ;)
Yeah, I've been playing with the cooker version a lot, but alsa seems
sketchy. It doesn't inert properly by default, and the mixer settings
seem to be screwed up. Some
Yeah, I've been playing with the cooker version a lot, but alsa seems
sketchy. It doesn't inert properly by default, and the mixer settings
seem to be screwed up. Some other modules don't insert by default any
more.
I've fixed many things since -test5, alsa should load fine now.
Please can
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 20:20, Olivier Blin wrote:
I've fixed many things since -test5, alsa should load fine now.
Please can you tell me the name of the modules that don't insert ?
And please report others bugs I should be aware of :)
Wow. I eat my words.
Test9.4mdk kicks ass. All modules
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 17:20, Olivier Blin wrote:
Yeah, I've been playing with the cooker version a lot, but alsa seems
sketchy. It doesn't inert properly by default, and the mixer settings
seem to be screwed up. Some other modules don't insert by default any
more.
I've fixed many
First of all, unlimited thanks for this package.
no problem, the real work is done by kernel developpers :)
Test9 has been running (with nvidia patched) since this morning
without any trouble, but the load has been reasonably light.
One thing I noticed that has nothing to do with the kernel
OH! I take it all back...
I just spent a whopping 20 minutes writing a song about how cool 2.6 is,
and then I went to record it, and my bloody audio interface won't work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] austin]# tail /var/log/messages
Nov 4 21:11:15 gamma373-179 kernel: hub 1-0:1.0: new USB device on port
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:09, Olivier Blin wrote:
First of all, unlimited thanks for this package.
no problem, the real work is done by kernel developpers :)
Test9 has been running (with nvidia patched) since this morning
without any trouble, but the load has been reasonably light.
One
It's an M-Audio Quattro USB interface. It works fine with the latest
2.4 kernel, especially the tmb version.
Does it require some patch to work with 2.4 or is the driver in alsa ?
Damn, the 2.6 song will have to wait until this is fixed... ;-)
I'm impatient to listen it :)
--
Olivier Blin
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:31, Olivier Blin wrote:
It's an M-Audio Quattro USB interface. It works fine with the latest
2.4 kernel, especially the tmb version.
Does it require some patch to work with 2.4 or is the driver in alsa ?
No, it should not.
When compiled from source, it works fine.
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:31, Olivier Blin wrote:
Does it require some patch to work with 2.4 or is the driver in alsa ?
Sorry, let me rephrase that...
It uses the standard snd-usb-audio module.
Damn, the 2.6 song will have to wait until this is fixed... ;-)
I'm impatient to listen it :)
I
Wow. I eat my words.
Test9.4mdk kicks ass. All modules load (alsa, firewire, USB, video,
even joystick!!!) This is very cool.
thanks to svetljo, he told me how to fix it
Responsiveness is insane. Like even my mouse cursor moves faster. Is
that normal?
yes :)
it was quit normal in
This thing is insane.
With the 2.6 kernel, I can record many many tracks of two-channel 44.1k
audio, in full duplex, without a click or a pop or a glitch of latency
or noise. No mm kernel. No capabilities. No frigging with IRQ or alsa
or tmp settings. Just install the kernel and record.
I
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:16:23 -0500
Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OH! I take it all back...
really ? :)
I just spent a whopping 20 minutes writing a song about how cool 2.6
is, and then I went to record it, and my bloody audio interface won't
work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] austin]# tail
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 00:02, Olivier Blin wrote:
Your problem has been reported here :
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg09733.html
Enh... probably best to let them fix it. There are several Quattro
users on that list, including Takashi, who wrote the alsa usb driver in
the
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 06:02:27 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:16:23 -0500
Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OH! I take it all back...
really ? :)
I just spent a whopping 20 minutes writing a song about how cool 2.6
is, and
I forgot to mention that I tried the
kernel-enterprise-2.4.22.23mdk
kernel. All enterprise kernels have worked up to and
including 21mdk. Is there possibly another new
package required by 23mdk that I have overlooked?
I am running the 9.2 bittorrent version.
I am using grub as bootloader.
I have
zephod ha scritto:
On Saturday 01 November 2003 12:54, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
I got the same error in 9.1 (I was using reiserfs there too). Only kernel
working was initial 2.4.21-0.13mdk. Every other kernel, e.g. the
2.4.21-0.25mdk was
causing an error like that...
just for information:
Quel Qun wrote:
reiserfs seems to be borked.
I also get kernel panic with harddrive which has 3 partitions on it:
swap, ext3 and ntfs. So it is not just reiserfs. Worked just fine with
-19mdk kernel.
--
Live long and prosper!
Hi,
I also get kernel panic with harddrive which has 3 partitions on it:
swap, ext3 and ntfs. So it is not just reiserfs. Worked just fine with
-19mdk kernel.
Please try .test3 kernel on a UP system. I think you really should get
a message about partition table consistency checks failure and
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 22:25, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
In case -22mdk worked. Could you boot into -22mdk and fdisk -l /dev/hda
or whatever holds your reiserfs partitions? And, a dd if=/dev/hda
of=my_disk count=2 could help too.
A little more
Hi,
Let me know if you need anything else.
Provided you use normal UP kernels, could you try the following kernels:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
And with .test1 please check for any partition table check failure
message. This shouldn't fix anything but trying to isolate
It is very easy to reproduce, but it has nothing to do
with reiserfs. I have the following scsi partitions:
/dev/sda5 / ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/sda1 /boot ext2 defaults 1 2
/dev/sda9 /usr ext3 defaults 1 2
/dev/sda7 /var xfs defaults 1 2
/dev/sda11 /home xfs defaults 1 2
I got the following lines
Quel Qun ha scritto:
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 22:25, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
In case -22mdk worked. Could you boot into -22mdk and fdisk -l /dev/hda
or whatever holds your reiserfs partitions? And, a dd if=/dev/hda
of=my_disk count=2 could help too.
A little
On Saturday 01 November 2003 12:54, Giuseppe Ghibò wrote:
I got the same error in 9.1 (I was using reiserfs there too). Only kernel
working was initial 2.4.21-0.13mdk. Every other kernel, e.g. the
2.4.21-0.25mdk was
causing an error like that...
just for information: 2.4.21-0.18mdk works ok
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 01:07, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
Let me know if you need anything else.
Provided you use normal UP kernels, could you try the following kernels:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
And with .test1 please check for any partition table check
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
Did it work with -22mdk?
Hi,
reiserfs seems to be borked.
In case -22mdk worked. Could you boot into -22mdk and fdisk -l /dev/hda
or whatever holds your reiserfs partitions? And, a dd if=/dev/hda
of=my_disk count=2 could help too.
A little more information about the kernel panic would be helpful too
as we can't
52 matches
Mail list logo
