Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep, because it does not clear the old records.
? you mean, the noise in urpmi.cfg?
> I also have a file (urpmi.cfg) showing my ftp password in clear.
not a big deal, is it?
do you have any solution?
Yep, because it does not clear the old records.
I also have a file (urpmi.cfg) showing my ftp password in clear.
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The problem is that its (urpm*) database update is cumbersome.
>
> urpmi.update -a , cumbersome?
=-=
k
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The problem is that its (urpm*) database update is cumbersome.
>
> cumberwhat ? it the same file of Packages.gz from debian.
Cumbersome = clumsy, hawkward, hard to use. Also, I still haven't found how to
up
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that its (urpm*) database update is cumbersome.
urpmi.update -a , cumbersome?
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that its (urpm*) database update is cumbersome.
cumberwhat ? it the same file of Packages.gz from debian.
> Welcome to Frisco, Chmou!
ironic ?
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
San-Francisco, CA USA
The problem is that its (urpm*) database update is cumbersome.
Welcome to Frisco, Chmou!
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, you are btruying to make RPM more apt like... but these frontens
are
> > odd.. didn't ROM v4 just come out
David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, you are btruying to make RPM more apt like... but these frontens are
> odd.. didn't ROM v4 just come out? How about putting these features into
> RPM itself? :)
urpmi urpf etc... are to rpm what apt is to dpkg (a front-end).
--
MandrakeSoft Inc
Well, you are btruying to make RPM more apt like... but these frontens are
odd.. didn't ROM v4 just come out? How about putting these features into
RPM itself? :)
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Vincent wrote:
> David Walluck a écrit :
> >
> > Isn't this one of the major problems of RPM? It needs a lib bu
David Walluck a écrit :
>
> Isn't this one of the major problems of RPM? It needs a lib but can't
> tell you what package to get.
urpmf can !
Vince
Thanks a lot.
Now I have no excuse to delay my accounting ;-)
=-=
kk1
>From: Christopher Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Cooker] libgncengine.so.0?
>Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:50:04 -0400 (EDT)
>
>My sc
end
#
Surely not the best but it works.
Of course, through ftp if you don't mirror locally, it 'might' be a bit
slow...
=-=
kk1
>From: David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Cooker] libgncengine.so.0?
Not a problem of RPM but the packager (me) who was trying to get this out
and forgot to include the libs :-( The missing lib is part of the
package. Fixed now in -3mdk. Sorry.
-Chris
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, David Walluck wrote:
> Isn't this one of the major problems of RPM? It needs a lib but c
My screw-up, fixed try -3mdk
-Chris
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Quel Qun wrote:
> The new gnucash cannot be installed:
>
> # rpm -Uvh gnucash-1.4.2-1mdk.i586.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> libgncengine.so.0 is needed by gnucash-1.4.2-1mdk
>
> I cannot find any rpm containing this li
David Walluck wrote:
>
> Isn't this one of the major problems of RPM? It needs a lib but can't
> tell you what package to get.
FWIW, you can easily find out if you use http://www.rpmfind.net.
Bring up the page for an RPM and it will show all the dependencies.
Click on a dependency and it will
Isn't this one of the major problems of RPM? It needs a lib but can't
tell you what package to get.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Quel Qun wrote:
> The new gnucash cannot be installed:
>
> # rpm -Uvh gnucash-1.4.2-1mdk.i586.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> libgncengine.so.0 is needed by gnuca
15 matches
Mail list logo