Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I run urpmi --auto-select --auto --keep urpmi tells me that the rpm
packages have faulty signatures. When I run urpmi /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/*.rpm
the packages are installed without any problems.
The faulty signature is in fact a missing signature
Le Mercredi 17 Septembre 2003 09:37, lamikr_mdk a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lamikr]# urpmi --auto-select --no-verify-rpm
The following packages have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
drakconf-9.2-4mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied harddrake-ui = 9.2-6mdk)
harddrake-9.2-11mdk.i586 (due to
Pascal Terjan wrote:
installation de
//var/mirror/cooker/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk.i586.rpm
Préparation... ##
L'installation a échoué:
file /etc/rc.d/init.d/kheader from install of
bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 22:28:14 +0200
Pascal Terjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A conflict between bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk and initscripts =
7.06-23mdk would solve that.
I had suggested a prereq in bootloader utils for initscripts =
7.06-21mdk, since the conflict only occurs because
On Friday 05 September 2003 04:52 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 22:28:14 +0200
Pascal Terjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A conflict between bootloader-utils-1.6-1mdk and initscripts =
7.06-23mdk would solve that.
I had suggested a prereq in bootloader utils for
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to run urpmi.update -a first. However, it may have simply been that
updates were simply
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 10:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to run urpmi.update -a first.
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
Really it should give a message of some sort,
Bellegarde Cedric [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if there
is noting to upgrade.
fixed in urpmi-4.4-29mdk.
François.
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 10:54, John Keller wrote:
Bellegarde Cedric wrote:
When i run an urpmi --auto-select, urpmi don't tell me anyting if
there
is noting to upgrade.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]# urpmi --auto-select
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnumdk]#
You need to
Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had both ftp.sunsite and ftp.sunet as sources for main and as contrib
and contrb1.
When updating from only 1 of the 2, updates are properly shown But also
listed are same named from /var/lib/urpmi for 2nd site.
Case in point was from this
On 31 May 2002 16:10:52 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote:
Can you switch (as workaround) using --media ... options, it is
problematic to fix it on urpmi as switching to lower interface is to
be done currently.
Easily done.
I have 2 only in case my primary is down/overlaoded
On 31 Aug 2001 10:36:57 +0200, François Pons wrote:
Mark Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
starting today urpmi has been failing to install any packages from my
cooker source. If it matters, the files are on an SMB share. I removed
the media, and re-added it, and still get the same thing.
Mark Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
starting today urpmi has been failing to install any packages from my
cooker source. If it matters, the files are on an SMB share. I removed
the media, and re-added it, and still get the same thing.
unable to parse correctly
14 matches
Mail list logo
