[Cooker] TUX?

2003-11-02 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hi. I asked to have TUX included before but it was decided not to use the patch because security considerations. But now there's new times with zillions of kernels laying around. So, maybe Thomas or some one else would consider implementing TUX into a new server oriented kernel?

Re: [Cooker] TUX?

2003-11-02 Thread Diego Iastrubni
if i am not mistaking, it was removed in 2.6 since it sux ass so much. why would you need that? http in user mode is good enough. , 2 2003, 18:03,Oden Eriksson: Hi. I asked to have TUX included before but it was decided not to use the patch because security considerations. But now

Re: [Cooker] TUX?

2003-11-02 Thread Han Boetes
Oden Eriksson wrote: I asked to have TUX included before but it was decided not to use the patch because security considerations. But now there's new times with zillions of kernels laying around. So, maybe Thomas or some one else would consider implementing TUX into a new server oriented

Re: [Cooker] TUX?

2003-11-02 Thread Leon Brooks
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:03, Oden Eriksson wrote: I asked to have TUX included before but it was decided not to use the patch because security considerations. Now Tux is considered deprecated (but maybe not by Mandrake, who knows?) because a lot of what it did to provide extreme responsiveness

Re: [Cooker] tux RPM fjukiness

2001-11-23 Thread Oden Eriksson
fredagen den 23 november 2001 16.38 skrev du: R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1:tux### [100%] error reading information on service %{1}: No such file or directory error: execution of %post scriptlet from tux-2.1.0-1mdk