[root@grapefruit /mnt/kenobippc/8.0/updates]# ls
kernel-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm
kernel-doc-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm
kernel-enterprise-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm
kernel-headers-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm
kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm
kernel-smp-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm
kernel-source-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm
lm_utils
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:53:12AM +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> Well :) :
Show off. :P
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
"Before you set out for revenge dig two graves."
- Chinese Saying
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a Titanium with 512 MB (maxed out at the time I bought it) and a
> Dell laptop with 512 MB (also maxed out).
Well :) :
(chmou@kernel)[~]-% cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 6
On 16 Sep 2001, Sylvain OBEGI wrote:
SO> Ouah. Impressive. I never saw a machine with 512+ RAM. Mine has 256. My
SO> personnal server 64, my iBook 384 and so on.. And this works great.
SO> Could you please precise what theses box are used for ?
Normal workstations at home, surfing, developing, a
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:00:37AM +0200, Sylvain OBEGI wrote:
> Ouah. Impressive. I never saw a machine with 512+ RAM. Mine has 256. My
> personnal server 64, my iBook 384 and so on.. And this works great.
> Could you please precise what theses box are used for ?
I have a Titanium with 512 MB (m
On dim, 2001-09-16 at 00:44, Henrik Edlund wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
>
> SB> I realize that, especially on Macs where folks are doing a lot of
> SB> graphics work and with the current low price of RAM, but I need to
> SB> follow what the main distro does - so it will need
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
SB> I realize that, especially on Macs where folks are doing a lot of
SB> graphics work and with the current low price of RAM, but I need to
SB> follow what the main distro does - so it will need to be
SB> enterprise for now.
Well, I don't know anybody e
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Henrik Edlund wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
>
> SB>
> SB> Unless you need HIMEM or aic7xxx, you may want to hold off trying the
> SB> recent kernel I put up. Chmouel informs me that HIMEM may have negative
> SB> effects on machines with <512M. I am go
Henrik Edlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe some better naming than "Enterprise", like 512M+ or so. A lot of
> home users have 512M to 4096M today. The days with less than 512M in home
> machine are long gone.
this is the standard we have used for ia32 (aka: main tree) i don't
think it is
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stew Benedict wrote:
SB>
SB> Unless you need HIMEM or aic7xxx, you may want to hold off trying the
SB> recent kernel I put up. Chmouel informs me that HIMEM may have negative
SB> effects on machines with <512M. I am going to rework the RPM and release:
SB>
SB> kernel
SB> ke
Unless you need HIMEM or aic7xxx, you may want to hold off trying the
recent kernel I put up. Chmouel informs me that HIMEM may have negative
effects on machines with <512M. I am going to rework the RPM and release:
kernel
kernel-SMP
kernel-enterprise
like on x86
enterprise will have HIMEM s
11 matches
Mail list logo