kernel updates

2001-09-17 Thread Stew Benedict
[root@grapefruit /mnt/kenobippc/8.0/updates]# ls kernel-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm kernel-doc-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm kernel-enterprise-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm kernel-headers-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm kernel-smp-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm kernel-source-2.4.4-6.4mdk.ppc.rpm lm_utils

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-16 Thread Ben Reser
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:53:12AM +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Well :) : Show off. :P -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "Before you set out for revenge dig two graves." - Chinese Saying

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-16 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a Titanium with 512 MB (maxed out at the time I bought it) and a > Dell laptop with 512 MB (also maxed out). Well :) : (chmou@kernel)[~]-% cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 6

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-15 Thread Henrik Edlund
On 16 Sep 2001, Sylvain OBEGI wrote: SO> Ouah. Impressive. I never saw a machine with 512+ RAM. Mine has 256. My SO> personnal server 64, my iBook 384 and so on.. And this works great. SO> Could you please precise what theses box are used for ? Normal workstations at home, surfing, developing, a

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-15 Thread Ben Reser
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:00:37AM +0200, Sylvain OBEGI wrote: > Ouah. Impressive. I never saw a machine with 512+ RAM. Mine has 256. My > personnal server 64, my iBook 384 and so on.. And this works great. > Could you please precise what theses box are used for ? I have a Titanium with 512 MB (m

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-15 Thread Sylvain OBEGI
On dim, 2001-09-16 at 00:44, Henrik Edlund wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stew Benedict wrote: > > SB> I realize that, especially on Macs where folks are doing a lot of > SB> graphics work and with the current low price of RAM, but I need to > SB> follow what the main distro does - so it will need

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-15 Thread Henrik Edlund
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stew Benedict wrote: SB> I realize that, especially on Macs where folks are doing a lot of SB> graphics work and with the current low price of RAM, but I need to SB> follow what the main distro does - so it will need to be SB> enterprise for now. Well, I don't know anybody e

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-15 Thread Stew Benedict
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Henrik Edlund wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stew Benedict wrote: > > SB> > SB> Unless you need HIMEM or aic7xxx, you may want to hold off trying the > SB> recent kernel I put up. Chmouel informs me that HIMEM may have negative > SB> effects on machines with <512M. I am go

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Henrik Edlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe some better naming than "Enterprise", like 512M+ or so. A lot of > home users have 512M to 4096M today. The days with less than 512M in home > machine are long gone. this is the standard we have used for ia32 (aka: main tree) i don't think it is

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-15 Thread Henrik Edlund
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Stew Benedict wrote: SB> SB> Unless you need HIMEM or aic7xxx, you may want to hold off trying the SB> recent kernel I put up. Chmouel informs me that HIMEM may have negative SB> effects on machines with <512M. I am going to rework the RPM and release: SB> SB> kernel SB> ke

Re: kernel updates

2001-09-15 Thread Stew Benedict
Unless you need HIMEM or aic7xxx, you may want to hold off trying the recent kernel I put up. Chmouel informs me that HIMEM may have negative effects on machines with <512M. I am going to rework the RPM and release: kernel kernel-SMP kernel-enterprise like on x86 enterprise will have HIMEM s