Ezra Peisach wrote:
I move that the names in the scheme scripts be changed to the american
names and that a new script British.scm be put in place.
Well, that's just crazy talk. The scripting interface should clearly use
the established language of science, which transcends national
Dear Coot Users,
I am trying to run, coot-0.6.1-binary-Linux-i386-fedora-4-gtk2, at my
Fedora10 Linux machine...
At startup I got this message:
daffy-mochma 7% coot
COOT_PREFIX is /net/fileserver/xtal/graphics/coot-Linux-i386-fedora-4-gtk2
Hi Martin,
Martin Moche wrote:
Dear Coot Users,
I am trying to run, coot-0.6.1-binary-Linux-i386-fedora-4-gtk2, at my
Fedora10 Linux machine...
Eeek - Stop right there! The correct solution is to use the Fedora 10
binary.
... which seems not to to be in place yet...
OK, it is now,
Goodness, sounds like fun.
Coot does have an alignmutate function of course, but you don't get to
fiddle with the sequence alignment - Coot uses its own alignment [1].
My understanding is that should be fine for ~70% sequence identity or
better. My feeling though is that it is not widely
Kevin Cowtan wrote:
Ezra Peisach wrote:
I move that the names in the scheme scripts be changed to the american
names and that a new script British.scm be put in place.
Well, that's just crazy talk. The scripting interface should clearly use
the established language of science, which
Translating coot? With google, that's a doddle!
/French/: foulque f
/Spanish: /focha
/Portuguese: /galeirão
:)
On 28/01/2010 10:50, Paul Emsley wrote:
Kevin Cowtan wrote:
Ezra Peisach wrote:
I move that the names in the scheme scripts be changed to the
american names and that a new
Maybe I will get away with this one, as English is not my first language.
I think translating interfaces/programs is a gimmick: at the end of
the day, scientists (people!) need to be able to talk to each other,
so need a common language. This happens to be English (at the moment).
So we
