Re: [COOT] Coot finding phenix.probe and not standalone probe

2009-08-18 Thread Bernhard Lohkamp
> Oops. I'll get rid of that "feature". However, I'm having trouble > doingthe equivalent in Python - I tried this: > > run_scheme_command("define *probe-command* \"%s\"" % probe_command) > > and it gave me this output: > > INFO:: Command: define *probe-command* > "/Users/nat/phenix/src/build

Re: [COOT] Coot finding phenix.probe and not standalone probe

2009-08-17 Thread Nathaniel Echols
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Ben Eisenbraun wrote: > > The Phenix GUI will modify this file (only if you launch Coot from it) to > > ensure that Coot can find Probe, which could be causing the problem - I > > didn't take into account the possibility of a home directory being shared > > across

Re: [COOT] Coot finding phenix.probe and not standalone probe

2009-08-17 Thread Ben Eisenbraun
Hi Nat, > > Is Coot doing some magic when it tries to figure out where probe/reduce are > > installed? Grepping through the source looking for phenix didn't turn > > anything obvious up. > > The file ~/.coot may define a specific binary, which I assume will override > anything in $PATH. That wa

Re: [COOT] Coot finding phenix.probe and not standalone probe

2009-08-17 Thread Nathaniel Echols
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Ben Eisenbraun wrote: > I have a very odd issue. I have two builds of Coot, one for OS X Intel and > one for OS X PPC. On each of those platforms, I have a standalone > probe/reduce in the shell PATH. When I run either of these Coots, they > manage to find and t

[COOT] Coot finding phenix.probe and not standalone probe

2009-08-17 Thread Ben Eisenbraun
I have a very odd issue. I have two builds of Coot, one for OS X Intel and one for OS X PPC. On each of those platforms, I have a standalone probe/reduce in the shell PATH. When I run either of these Coots, they manage to find and try to use the phenix.probe installed in our linux branch. >Fro