Re: [COOT] Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

2008-10-23 Thread Mark Collins
Hi Just refined a glycine and a leucine, and realized there was a problem with the script. Here is version 0.2 Mark On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Jonathan Winger wrote: Fantastic. Thank you! jon On Oct 22, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Mark Collins wrote: sorry that should have been sed -f

Re: [COOT] Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

2008-10-22 Thread Mark Collins
Hi JonHere is a sed script to make life easier.run on command prompt withsed pdb4coot.sed file.pdb > newcoot.pdb pdb4coot.sed Description: Binary data MarkOn Oct 21, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Jonathan Winger wrote:Hi Mark,I compared the names of the H atoms for each of the residue types in my pdb file

Re: [COOT] Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

2008-10-22 Thread Mark Collins
sorry that should have been sed -f pdb4coot.sed file.pdb newcoot.pdb mark On Oct 21, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Jonathan Winger wrote: Hi Mark, I compared the names of the H atoms for each of the residue types in my pdb file with their cif files in the coot monomer library (for example, see

Re: [COOT] Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

2008-10-21 Thread Mark Collins
Hi Jonathan Did you find/get a fix for this? I just switched to pdb v3 file, from the happy and well behaved v2 file. It seems that all H_3 position Hydrogens are the problem (ie HB3, HG3 etc.) and as descirbed fly off when using RSR. Thanks Mark (os 10.4 G4, coot 0.5) On Sun, 5 Oct

Re: [COOT] Flying hydrogen issue in coot 0.5

2008-10-21 Thread Paul Emsley
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Emsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Mark, The issue here is that the dictionary does not define those atoms for e.g. ARG and GLN. For ARG and GLN, the atoms bound to the CG are HG1 and HG2 - not Hx3. i.e. Coot doesn't know about bonds to those