Re: Rawhide buildroot broken: GPG problem

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 7:28 PM Jonathan Leroy wrote: > > Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 21:25, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit > : > > Any ideas when this would happen? The fix doesn't seem to have propagated > > yet. > > Hi all, > > Same error here on all my rawhide builds. I found a problem. But it will

Re: Download counters unavailables

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jonathan Leroy wrote: > > Le lun. 28 janv. 2019 à 14:59, Michal Novotny a écrit : > > I've investigated copr-backend part and it seems to be ok there. > > > > I will need to revisit it at the end of this week because it needs more

Re: Download counters unavailables

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:19 PM Jonathan Leroy wrote: > > Hi, > > The repositories download counters (the ones in the "Architectures" > columns) seems to be stuck at zero. I've investigated copr-backend part and it seems to be ok there. I will need to revisit it at the end of this week because i

Re: Download counters unavailables

Hello Jonathan! On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 2:19 PM Jonathan Leroy wrote: > > Hi, > > The repositories download counters (the ones in the "Architectures" > columns) seems to be stuck at zero. We will take look at it. Thank you! clime > > Thank you. > > -- > Jonathan Leroy > ___

Re: Importing stuck?

Hello! On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 12:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hi, > > I've noticed my importing task take a while and the queue looks long already: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/status/importing/ > > While there are no pending on running builds. > > Is something broken? Yes, there was

Re: How to remove package from copr project

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:12 AM Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello Jean! > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:50 AM Jean-Marc Liger > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > For example these repositories haven't been removed. > > > > https://copr-be.cloud.fedo

Re: How to remove package from copr project

Hello Jean! On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:50 AM Jean-Marc Liger wrote: > > Hi, > > For example these repositories haven't been removed. > > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ligenix/entreprise-buildtools/epel-7-ppc64le/00843439-python3-mako/ > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/re

Re: Tasks stuck for weeks

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 12:49 PM Avi Kivity wrote: > > Looks like the problem is back: > > 4 days rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly 840406 libsolv > 0.7.2-18gd8a0a671.fc26 fedora-27-x86_64 > 46 hoursrpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly 841043 libsolv > 0.7.2-18gd8a0a671.fc26

Re: Tasks stuck for weeks

On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 4:20 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-12-28 at 19:53 +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 2:36 PM Avi Kivity > > wrote: > > > > > > From the task queue page: > > > &g

Re: Tasks stuck for weeks

Hello! On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 2:36 PM Avi Kivity wrote: > > From the task queue page: > > > Running Project Build Package NamePackage Version Chroot > 19 days rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly 835447 dnf-plugins-core > 4.0.2-6g675369a.fc26fedora-27-x86_64 > 17 days rpmso

Fixed error with key generation

Hello, we have just fixed an error with key generation that caused builds in newly created coprs to fail. Sorry for the problems Copr team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@

Planned Copr outage 2018-12-06

Hello, there will be an outage tomorrow starting at 11am UTC and last approximatelly four hours. Copr servers will be upgraded from f27 to f28. More details are here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7422 Best regards! Copr team ___ copr-d

Fedora Copr outage Fri 11pm - Sat 10am

Hello, there was a fedorainfracloud outage yesterday that caused all the data volumes that Copr uses to be mounted read-only. We actually caught this problem yesterday on copr-fe but that was only a part of it, which we didn't realize until today. All cloud instances were affected by the ro remoun

Re: ccached builds

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:56 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 15.10.2018 v 12:46 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): > > the design of copr build system isn't really ready to have this > > implemented, namely for storing the caches. The builder machines (which > > do the mock build) are freshly started VMs.

Re: Builds inaccessible

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:49 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hi Antonio, > > On Sunday, October 14, 2018 11:59:17 AM CEST Antonio Trande wrote: > > My running builds look inaccessible: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/build/809221/ > > > > What's going on? > > seems lik

Re: Copr outage

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:11 AM Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello, > > there is Copr outage right now. Spawning new builders does not work. See > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7279 Thanks to puiterwijk, this is now fixed! > > We hope it can be fixe

Copr outage

Hello, there is Copr outage right now. Spawning new builders does not work. See https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7279 We hope it can be fixed very soon. Copr team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscr

Re: GitHub webhooks not working

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:55 PM Jonathan Leroy wrote: > > Le jeu. 20 sept. 2018 à 18:22, Michal Novotny a écrit : > > The generated srpm is written to > > > > Wrote: > > /mnt/tmp/tmpktelyu3h/plexmediaplayer-fedora/SRPMS/plexmediaplayer-2.18.0-1.fc28.src.rpm >

Re: GitHub webhooks not working

rpm --output=$(outdir) Copr looks for the generated srpm in the $(outdir) Makefile variable (that you can pass to a custom shell script optionally). Let us know if it works for you Copr team On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM Jonathan Leroy wrote: > > Le dim. 16 sept. 2018 à 10:17, Michal Novotny

Re: Build succeded but shown as failed

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 6:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > Not sure what's going on but only the ppc64le builds even started and it's > been a while but they are showing as failed. > > When I look at the log dir the success file is there and the build log show > the packages were written and exit c

Re: GitHub webhooks not working

On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 4:44 PM Jonathan Leroy wrote: > > 2018-07-01 19:42 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Leroy : > > Thank you for your very detailed answer. I will look at that. > > Michal, > > I don't known if it's related to the use of the "make_sprm" build > method (first time I use it with Copr), but I

copr-frontend release: security update with fix for webhook secrets and pagure api tokens leakage!

Hello, there was a security update of copr-frontend which fixes problem with leaking of webhook secrets which are used to generate Github/Gitlab/Bitbucket webhook urls. Basically, it was possible to get webhook_secret of another project simply by forking it. You could then launch builds for that

Re: APIv3 docs and Pagure integration docs

You can also read some interesting background about developing the new API here: https://frostyx.cz/posts/copr-has-a-brand-new-api Please, enjoy Copr team On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:02 PM Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello! > > as we promised in the last release notification email

APIv3 docs and Pagure integration docs

Hello! as we promised in the last release notification email, here is documentation for APIv3: https://python-copr.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ClientV3.html and here for Pagure integration: https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#pagure-integration Both of those new features are

Re: branches cleanup

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:59 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, August 20, 2018 7:03:46 AM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 17.8.2018 v 11:24 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > > > We have lots of old branches. Here is the list: > > > > PEBKAC. The branches are not there any more. > > Not really PE

f29 chroots activated

Hello, we have just activated f29 chroots. Copr team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.h

f26 chroot deactivation

Hello, we have deactivated EOLed f26 chroots in production. Copr team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/

Building in rawhide

Hello, building in rawhide should work again. We have deployed configuration fix from https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/commit/96d76d277f30e89def09922431fd091c7d2bb26c Copr team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted

New release & deploy

Hello, we have just released & deployed the latest Copr stack. This one brings some long-expected features. Mainly: - APIv3 - Pagure Integration Both features will be presented on Flock and we will also write some tutorials/blog posts about them. As for APIv3, you can download python-copr from

Re: Copr overusing python standard library backports on Python 3

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 12:11 PM Michal Novotny wrote: > On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 7:42 PM Michal Novotny wrote: > >> Hello Miro, >> >> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 7:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >>> On 30.6.2018 15:22, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> > See

New copr-frontend release

Hello! we have just released and deployed copr-frontend-1.135. There are two major improvements: - graph page is working - there is a direct IRC contact on us in footer We hope it serves well! Copr team * https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-938de6c96a

Re: Copr overusing python standard library backports on Python 3

On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 7:42 PM Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello Miro, > > On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 7:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 30.6.2018 15:22, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > See >> > >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/py

One more round Infrastructure restarts

Hello, there will be another round of restarts starting from 21:00 UTC that may take up to six hours and may affect Copr building at some point. The issue is described in detail here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7065 Best regards Copr team ___

Copr scheduled outage

Hello, there will be an outage today starting at 21:00 UTC and it might take up to 4 hours. See details here https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7064 Best regards Copr team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To u

Re: Copr overusing python standard library backports on Python 3

Hello Miro, On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 7:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30.6.2018 15:22, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > See > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KARHO4ZVELJIFBCJG6TEG5ZWUXVVKBSR/ > > > > > > particularly: > > > > copr-backend > > c

Re: GitHub webhooks not working

Hello Jonathan! On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 6:56 PM Jonathan Leroy wrote: > Hi, > > I've setup a GitHub webhook according to the documentation at > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jleroy/PlexMediaPlayer/webhooks/. > When a push my commits to GitHub, a POST request is sent to the > webhook URL

Re: ssl enabled on copr-dist-git

-emu/build/772315/ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dani/qgis-testing/build/772316/ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rpmsoftwaremanagement/rpm-gitoverlay-1530266923.454272/build/772317/ With a sincere apology Copr team On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:35 AM Michal Novotny wrote: > He

ssl enabled on copr-dist-git

Hello, we have just enabled ssl for copr-dist-git with redirect from http:// to https://. There was a short outage that however hit a few builds: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rubensfig/grpc/fedora-26-x86_64/00772306-grpc/builder-live.log https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/

Deprecation of auto-packing for rpkg

Hello, if you are using SCM source type with rpkg source build method, then this is message is especially for you. Since rpkg version 2, the auto-packing functionality has been deprecated in favor of spec templates. Auto-packing means that when building from a Git repo, the content of this repo ge

copr-frontend-1.133 released

Hello! copr-frontend-1.133 has been just deployed and released [1]. The main point of this release was GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 of the European Union) compliance. Any user can now just delete his/her own personal data from Fedora Copr by going to "User Info" link in the us

Re: Invalid URL 'None': No schema supplied. Perhaps you meant http://None?

here, which affects automatic config discovery and reading. We will need to fix that on our builders. Sorry for that. Glad you find a workaround. clime > 2018-06-11 13:27 GMT+02:00 Michal Novotny : > >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Kevin Olbrich wrote: &

Re: Invalid URL 'None': No schema supplied. Perhaps you meant http://None?

Hello, On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Kevin Olbrich wrote: > Hi! > > I uploaded a new package to COPR with source located at GitHub. > Every time I try to build it by either starting it manually or with the > webhook, it fails with: > > Downloading None > None > Exception raised during packag

New Release

Hello, we have deployed a new Copr stack. Hurray! The main highlights are that copr-dist-git as the last missing piece has been rewritten into python3 meaning that the whole stack now runs on python3. Then some new openSUSE chroots were introduced. Thanks to Neal Gompa, you can now build for: op

Re: COPR outage

fsck checks on both machines have passed successfully. Copr should be back now. Copr team On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > there were some filesystem errors reported on both copr-dist-git and > copr-backend machines. Right now, both machines are

COPR outage

Hello, there were some filesystem errors reported on both copr-dist-git and copr-backend machines. Right now, both machines are stopped and fsck is running on them. The service will be unavailable for some time. Copr team ___ copr-devel mailing list --

Re: Backporting from rawhide: setting %fedora to 29

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 14.5.2018 15:09, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 14.5.2018 14:20, Michal Novotny wrote: >> >>> Can we cover it just by providing "with" and "without" fields for >>> chroots/builds

Re: Backporting from rawhide: setting %fedora to 29

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 14.5.2018 12:35, Michal Novotny wrote: > >> Now to my problem: some packages update rawhide only and the >> fedpkg+rpkg integration works like a charm. Other packages however >> keep all the branches

Re: Backporting from rawhide: setting %fedora to 29

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > I do backport stuff from rawhide in my coprs a lot. The relatively newly > announced fedmsg+rpkg thing is making my life easier than ever. So first of > all, kudos! > > Now to my problem: some packages update rawhide only and the fed

copr-backend out of service

Hello, copr-backend was out service temporarily due to incomatible python2-novaclient package that got installed last night. We have downgraded the package back to version 3.3.1 installed from Koji, which is compatible with the current cloud. COPR team

copr-frontend downtime

Hello, there was an unexpected copr-frontend downtime aproximatelly from 7:30pm UTC to 8pm UTC due to instance resizing to handle higher load. With hopes for a smoother experience COPR team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.or

rpkg 2.2 deployed

Hello, rpkg 2.2 will now slowly start appearing on Copr builders after their recyclation. If you are using {{{ git_pack }}} macro in your spec file, note that this version contains an important bugfix for symlinks present in your project. The previous rpkg version would basically invalidate the (

openSUSE tumbleweed chroots enabled experimentally

Hello, we have experimentally enabled chroots opensuse-tumbleweed-ppc64le and opensuse-tumbleweed-x86_64. Best regards! COPR team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fed

copr-frontend release

Hello folks, I have released and deployed copr-frontend-1.131: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e562d3fdd8 Main thing there is fixed fedmsg listener that should now correctly rebuild on both src.fp.o and pagure messages into main repos as well forked repos and it should build a

ppc64le builders problem solved

Hello, there was a problem with ppc64le builder spawning after yesterday's cloud maintenance. This is now fixed. The problem is described in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6889. Sorry for the problems COPR team ___ copr-devel mailing list

Re: New release

/FEDORA-2018-85a4ea93f7 clime On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Dominik Turecek < > dture...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> we have released new versions of backend, frontend, and rpmbuild. >>

Re: New release

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Dominik Turecek wrote: > Hello, > > we have released new versions of backend, frontend, and rpmbuild. > The release contains mostly fixes and unbundling of static libraries in > frontend, > as well as the addition of rpkg to COPR. > > We expect the packages to be

builder image upgrade

Hello, we have upgraded builder images to contain the latest packages for f27, including redhat-rpm-config as requested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571336. COPR team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To

disk-space was full on copr-be

Hello, we have had a problem with full disk volume for storing builds on copr-be. This was due to a bug with copr_prune_results scripts, which deletes old builds (package builds older than 14 days for which there is a newer package build). The bug is now fixed and the script is running. COPR team

Re: Failing to sync external repos for some chroots

Hello Guilherme, e.g. this repo source: https://rpm.nodesource.com/pub_8.x/el/ (https_rpm_nodesource_com_pub_8_x_el_releasever_basearch) is only valid for epel chroots and should be only added for those (see 'Edit' link for individual chroots in project settings). The repo with id https_rpm_nod

Re: Builders are slower than ever

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Jean-Marc Liger < >> jean-marc.li...@parisdescartes.fr> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >

Re: Builders are slower than ever

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Jean-Marc Liger < > jean-marc.li...@parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Since a couple of days, builders are anormaly slow. I can take hours for >> a s

Re: Builders are slower than ever

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Jean-Marc Liger wrote: > Hi all, > > Since a couple of days, builders are anormaly slow. I can take hours for a > single build. > > Any reasons for that ? > We sincerely apologize for this. The current OpenStack platform on which COPR builders are running is outda

Re: Plenty of bogus builds with rpkg s.f.o push automation

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git/commits/master -> last commit is > from 2018-04-02. Yet the automation in > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/git/package/git/ still > builds several empty builds every couple hours.

mirror failures

Hello, as of recent month or two I quite often encounter mirror sync failures on COPR builders during the build setup. Could you, please, confirm that this is really the case and link the build logs here if possible? I will then setup some extended monitoring if this proves to be true. Thank you

Re: GitHub Apps

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Thursday, March 22, 2018 11:31:23 AM CET Jakub Kadlcik wrote: >> The chart says that we likely want to use GitHub App. It doesn't matter >> which way go, you always end up with GitHub App because of "Access >> everything? No". >> >> Also,

Re: Builders are locked in importing mode

Hello Jean-Marc! 2018-03-14 12:41 GMT+01:00 Jean-Marc Liger < jean-marc.li...@parisdescartes.fr>: > Hi, > > It seems builders are locked in importing mode ? > Yes, thank you, it was somehow stuck on downloading firefox. clime > Thanks, > > > > * Jean-Marc LIGER Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseaux d

Re: Can't build in f28

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:09:14AM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello, thank you for the report. Disk was full on copr-dist-git so I have > > enlarged it to twice the size. > > Thanks - the build succeeded no

Re: Can't build in f28

Hello Robert-André, On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On dimanche 11 mars 2018 01:09:14 CET Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello, thank you for the report. Disk was full on copr-dist-git so I have > > enlarged it to twice the size. > > > &

Re: Can't build in f28

Hello, thank you for the report. Disk was full on copr-dist-git so I have enlarged it to twice the size. Best Regards! clime On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On samedi 10 mars 2018 22:25:43 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/

Re: Slow SRPM uploads?

I tried right now and reached upload speed around 1.6 MB/s. I cannot really reproduce it. clime On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Both last night and this morning I'm experience EXTREMELY slow uploads > ~25kB/s... > > Is something going on that would cause that? > > Thanks,

frontend production update for yum-plugin-copr

Hello, we have just deployed a hotfix for *Bug 1550986* - HTTPS Error 500 when trying to enable repository trough yum-plugin-copr on RHEL7, Centos 7. `yum copr enable` should work again. COPR team __

new copr-frontend release

Hello, we have just deployed and released copr-frontend-1.129. This package contains the latest fixes upon big work done in copr-frontend-1.128. Also new python-copr-1.87 was released with a fix in ClientV2 regarding build statuses ("forked", "waiting") that were recently added into copr-frontend

Re: Release notes

Hello, I have just deployed copr-frontend with additional fixes for module building and custom method. There was a problem for both when running from GUI. clime On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello folks, > > last week on Friday, we released the latest versi

Release notes

Hello folks, last week on Friday, we released the latest version of our stack. It was quite a big release, probably the biggest we have done so far...so as expected some problems occured - mainly, fedmsg sending didn't work up until Saturday 11pm UTC, rpm download counting was a bit off (counting

New release

Hello, we have just deployed the latest COPR stack to the production. I will talk more about it on Monday. For now, you can enjoy the new graphs that our _very_ talented intern has made :)... COPR team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fed

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 10:54:48 AM CET Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello Pavel, > > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Pavel Raiskup > wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday, February 13, 20

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

Hello Pavel, On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:15:42 PM CET Michal Novotny wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Michal Novotny > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 201

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Michael Šimáček > wrote: > >> On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. >>> >>

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

Hello, On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Michael Šimáček wrote: > On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. >> >> Pavel >> >> On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >>> Because we are unable to find a cons

copr-backend upgraded

Hello, we have deployed copr-backend-1. 110-2 to production. This version contains patch to prevent multiple builder allocation for one srpm build, which caused occasional failures on signing. COPR team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fe

Planned Outage: COPR BACKEND upgrade - 2018-01-16 09:00 UTC

Planned Outage: COPR BACKEND upgrade - 2018-01-16 09:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2018-01-16 09:00 UTC, which will last approximately 0.5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-01-16 09:00

ChrotScan Enabled on copr-builders

Hello! To tackle the latest problems with synchronizing Fedora repos, we have employed mocks' ChrootScan plugin on builders to tackle them. It will take a bit of time until 'chroot_scan' directory with dnf logs (especially dn

failing ppc64le builds

If you encountered the following log record in builder-live.log on ppc64le: Running: unbuffer /usr/bin/mock --buildsrpm --spec /tmp/tmp75ah4ork/gawk.spec --sources /tmp/tmp75ah4ork --configdir /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs --resultdir /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results --define %_disable_sour

Re: copr-dist-git Internal Server Error

Hey, thank you for noticing. There was a SELinux configuration problem causing cgit (git_script_t) not being able to access any git content (git_user_content_t). We have fixed it by adding map permission for the git_script_t type: allow git_script_t git_user_content_t:file map; map permission is

after-release fixes

Hello, since the release on Monday, we have implemented and deployed the following fixes: - fixed building in epel-7-ppc64le chroot (by temporarily switching of nosync mock plugin on ppc64le until we have better fix: https://github.com/kjn/nosync/issues/3#issuecomment-353176672) - fixed make-srpm

Re: COPR outage at 1am UTC

I am very sorry. I meant 1pm UTC today. Best regrads On behalf of COPR team clime On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > today there will be a COPR outage lasting approximately for 1 hour > starting at 1 a.m. UTC. We will be upgrading most of the mac

COPR outage at 1am UTC

Hello, today there will be a COPR outage lasting approximately for 1 hour starting at 1 a.m. UTC. We will be upgrading most of the machines to the latest released Fedora version. COPR Team ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Re: is COPR down?

COPR is back now. Sorry for the problems. We get high load peaks at times. clime On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:05 PM, David Shea wrote: > Connection is timing out connecting to copr.fedorainfracloud.org. Is > there an ETA on when it will come back? > ___ >

running ppc64le builds

Hello, ppc64le builds https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/luya/scribus-unstable/build/682378/ and https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lsedlar/compose-tools/build/682451/ were affected by OpenStack maintenance to fix issues with ppc64le building in COPR. They are reported as running at the

COPR: usage of http:// in python client

Hello, we have found out that http://copr.fedoraproject.org was used as default API endpoint if no copr_url was specified for CoprClient initialization. This is now fixed in the latest version of python-copr (python-copr-1.84) and we recommend updating to that version. Also we have decided to revo

Re: long waiting times for COPR jobs

Hello Jean-Marc, answer is below... On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Jean-Marc Liger < jean-marc.li...@parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > Hi Clime, > Le 03/11/2017 à 06:39, Michal Novotny a écrit : > > Hey, > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > &

New Release

Hello! New COPR stack has just been released. It contains the following updates: copr-frontend 1.124-1 - fixed build_on_pagure_commit.py - optimized check_for_anitya_version_updates - allow to set use_bootstrap_container via API copr-backend 1.107-1 - kill all processes in copr-rpmbuild's proces

Re: long waiting times for COPR jobs

Hey, On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > lately, COPR pending job queues are holding jobs for pretty long time > (even hours). This is a buggy behaviour and we will be doing our best to > fix this issue in the following days. > as we have found

Re: New Deploy

Hello, On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > > I'll be writing docs for the new source type and all that can be done > with it...wait for it ;). Now this is just a quick update. > The mentioned docs can be found here: https://clime.github.io/2017/10/24/CO

long waiting times for COPR jobs

Hello, lately, COPR pending job queues are holding jobs for pretty long time (even hours). This is a buggy behaviour and we will be doing our best to fix this issue in the following days. Thank your for your patience COPR team ___ copr-devel mailing lis

Re: Counters down

o Clime, > Le 11/10/2017 à 14:05, Michal Novotny a écrit : > > Hello, > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Jean-Marc Liger < >> jean-marc.li...@parisdescartes.fr> wrote: >>

W42 2017 status

COPR: - finished implementation of unified SCM method - released and deployed the latest COPR stack - fixed bug in building with --initial-pkgs param when creating new project - made small src.fp.o + COPR CI demo RPKG: - made it work with forks at src.fedoraproject.org - updated spec - released ne

Re: ppc64le still in pending mode

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Jean-Marc Liger < jean-marc.li...@parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > Hello Clime! > > > Le 19/10/2017 à 12:32, Michal Novotny a écrit : > > Hello Jean! > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Jean-Marc Liger parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > &

Re: ppc64le still in pending mode

Hello Jean! On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Jean-Marc Liger < jean-marc.li...@parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that ppc64le builders are stuck in pending mode. > > Thank you for the info! It should be fixed now. > Regards, > > Jean-Marc > > __

New Deploy

Hello, we have just deployed the latest COPR stack. Apart from a few bugfixes, there is one important update: SCM source types were finally unified so now there is only one "SCM" tab. You can also use copr command-line client (copr-cli) to build for any Github/Gitlab/DistGit repo. See `copr-cli bu

  1   2   3   >