Fedora Rawhide builds failing due to missing GPG key?

Seeing this on all my rawhide builds: KEY-fedora-36-primary Public key for which-2.21-35.fc37.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: which-2.21-35.fc37.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-37-primary, file:///usr/share/dist

Re: Automated builds possible?

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 6:20 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, January 10, 2020 11:54:45 AM CET Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 09. 01. 20 v 16:17 Richard Shaw napsal(a): > > integrated with upstream-monitoring: > > > https://developer.fedoraproject.org/deploymen

Automated builds possible?

I just had a thought and wondered if it were possible. I have an upstream that posts alpha and beta releases to a specific URL. What I'd like copr (or something) to do is: 1. Monitor those URLs so it knows when a new alpha is pushed 2. Pull the spec file from fedora rawhide (master) 3. Run rpmdev

Re: COPR specific macros?

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 8:43 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 12. 19 v 15:23 Richard Shaw napsal(a): > > Is there a macro available that evaluates to TRUE/1 when building in > COPR? > > There are defined: > %copr_username > %copr_projectname > macros. They

COPR specific macros?

Is there a macro available that evaluates to TRUE/1 when building in COPR? Thanks, Richard ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: h

Build succeded but shown as failed

Not sure what's going on but only the ppc64le builds even started and it's been a while but they are showing as failed. When I look at the log dir the success file is there and the build log show the packages were written and exit code 0... https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/hobbes10

Slow SRPM uploads?

Both last night and this morning I'm experience EXTREMELY slow uploads ~25kB/s... Is something going on that would cause that? Thanks, Richard ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le

Re: copr-dist-git hotfixes

Maybe unrelated but I noticed that in the last few builds I did that all the log entries were entered twice... Thanks, Richard ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorah

62 packages importing none building?

Anyone know what's up? Thanks, Richard ___ copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Extraction error on ppc64

All builds completed fine for i686 and x86_64 but all my ppc64 builds failed, looking at one I saw this: [ 69%] Performing download step (verify and extract) for 'wsjtx' cd /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-1.6.0/build/wsjtx-prefix/src && /usr/bin/cmake -P /builddir/build/BUILD/wsjtx-1.6.0/build/wsjtx-p

Build log links/filenames swapped?

I had a failed build and went to inspect the logs, when I clicked on the link for the text log Chrome wouldn't display it, only download it. When I tried to open the file everything was garbled. On a whim I tried opening the .gz log file and it opened as plain text. I'm guessing the files are gett

74 tasks waiting, none running

I'm not sure what the problem is but there's 74 tasks waiting but no running tasks. The top tasks in the queue have been waiting for 3 hours. Thanks, Richard ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mai

Re: Version shows Release and dist tag?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote: > On 02/13/2015 05:26 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> >> I added a comment to the BZ... The release doesn't really bother me but >> it takes the dist tag from the SRPM which I think is a bad idea, and >> si

Re: Version shows Release and dist tag?

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote: > On 02/12/2015 04:31 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I just got done with a couple of builds for EPEL6 which I based on SRPMS >> from rawhide which completed fine but the version column in both the >> build and monitor

Version shows Release and dist tag?

I just got done with a couple of builds for EPEL6 which I based on SRPMS from rawhide which completed fine but the version column in both the build and monitor screen show the Release and dist tag. Is this expected? Thanks, Richard ___ copr-devel mailin

Re: Delete orphaned build?

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 11/03/2014 02:46 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> If you look here: >> >> http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ >> hobbes1069/WSJT/fedora-20-x86_64/ >> >> The hamlib3 build is not liste

Re: Delete orphaned build?

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote: > On 11/02/2014 07:10 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I have an orphaned build in one of my project repositories (builds >> present, >> build ID gone) >> >> How can I clean this up without deleting my whole p

Delete orphaned build?

I have an orphaned build in one of my project repositories (builds present, build ID gone) How can I clean this up without deleting my whole project? Thanks, Richard ___ copr-devel mailing list copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahoste