I am glad it finally works. Let us know in case of any further problems.
Thank you
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2016-12-09 at 16:27 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2016-12-09 at 11:41 +, Michal Novotný wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sáb, 2016
On Sex, 2016-12-09 at 16:27 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2016-12-09 at 11:41 +, Michal Novotný wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sáb, 2016-12-03 at 22:41 +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
> > >
> > > I built successfully 2 packages for 26 and on 3rd fails [1] with
> > > same
> > > error:
On Sex, 2016-12-09 at 11:41 +, Michal Novotný wrote:
> >
> > On Sáb, 2016-12-03 at 22:41 +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
> >
> > I built successfully 2 packages for 26 and on 3rd fails [1] with
> > same
> > error:
> > Failed to synchronize cache for repo
> > 'coprbecloudfedoraprojectorg_results
> On Sáb, 2016-12-03 at 22:41 +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
>
> I built successfully 2 packages for 26 and on 3rd fails [1] with same
> error:
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo
> 'coprbecloudfedoraprojectorg_results_sergiomb_kde4for23_fedora26i386_de
> vel', disabling.
>
> analyzing i686 roo
On Sáb, 2016-12-03 at 22:41 +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
> The reason is that the backend_rawhide_to_release command that I used
> for transition of builds from rawhide to f26 copies only the latest
> successful builds for each package. Your needed dependency, however,
> comes from a build 468985 t
The reason is that the backend_rawhide_to_release command that I used for
transition of builds from rawhide to f26 copies only the latest successful
builds for each package. Your needed dependency, however, comes from a
build 468985 that was marked as failed but still contains (as the only one)
the
On Sáb, 2016-12-03 at 19:27 +, cl...@redhat.com wrote:
> Do you have "manual createrepo" option enabled for your project? I.e.
> does devel subdirectory exist in the repo?
No , I don't have manual repo enabled , the repo was rawhide repo but
now is f26 , builroot fail to have packages from tha
devel repo is always added as additional repository even if the actual repo is
not present. That might be the cause. It was always like this.
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le..
Do you have "manual createrepo" option enabled for your project? I.e. does
devel subdirectory exist in the repo?
___
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
On Sex, 2016-12-02 at 11:13 +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have added the following chroots
>
> custom-1-i386
> custom-1-ppc64le
> custom-1-x86_64
> epel-7-i386
>
> and removed
>
> fedora-rawhide-i386
> fedora-rawhide-x86_64
> .
>
> Custom chroots were a long expected feature that
Dne 2.12.2016 v 11:13 Michal Novotny napsal(a):
> It was somehow missed when epel-7 chroots were added so finally we have it.
They were not missed. RHEL7 was released only for x86_64 and so was only CentOS
later. Only some time after the release
was added i386 for CentOS. And it was never release
On Friday, December 2, 2016 11:13:20 AM CET Michal Novotny wrote:
> fedora-rawhide chroots were some residue of the yesterday's release. They
> should have been already disabled as fedora-26 chroots replaced them.
Ah, when I saw rawhide chroots available this morning I was very happy (after
your a
Hello,
I have added the following chroots
custom-1-i386
custom-1-ppc64le
custom-1-x86_64
epel-7-i386
and removed
fedora-rawhide-i386
fedora-rawhide-x86_64
.
Custom chroots were a long expected feature that enable you to configure
your build environment almost at free will (by additional repos
13 matches
Mail list logo
