Changeset: 1755493c5774
Author:darcy
Date: 2009-12-03 18:19 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/1755493c5774
6907177: Update jdk tests to remove unncessary -source and -target options
Reviewed-by: ohair
! test/demo/jvmti/hprof/CpuOldTest.java
! test/demo/jvmti/hpr
Looks fine Joe. I also have some of these same changes, on the jvmti demo
tests but they should merge fine when I get your changeset.
-kto
Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello.
The fix for 6907177 "Update jdk tests to remove unncessary -source and
-target options" alters about 100 regression tests in the j
Hello.
The fix for 6907177 "Update jdk tests to remove unncessary -source and
-target options" alters about 100 regression tests in the jdk repository
that have inappropriate "-source" options to compile code to earlier
source levels. Often these directives were created in JDK 5 before the
d
Changeset: 121e0ebf1658
Author:darcy
Date: 2009-12-03 14:03 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/121e0ebf1658
6906748: Project Coin: Minor strings in switch cleanup
Reviewed-by: jjg
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/code/Source.java
! src/share/classes/
Changeset: bc12627832e0
Author:vinnie
Date: 2009-12-03 21:30 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/bc12627832e0
6906854: SSL/Krb5 testcase should not use a fixed port number
Reviewed-by: alanb
! test/ProblemList.txt
! test/sun/security/krb5/auto/SSL.java
This is exactly the solution I present to users of JBoss Marshalling. The
access check performed verifies that the field being updated is a
non-static instance field (final or otherwise, any access level) of the
caller's class; IllegalAccessException is then not thrown at "runtime" when
the fi
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 00:57, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
> > I think, we can overcome the slowdown. The point of my prototype is to
> check
> > the general performance characteristics. Slowdown is more likely due to
> the
> > poorly optimized
Peter Jones wrote:
Regarding a language solution, though, I don't see how to avoid making a
[...]
`readObject` is a `psuedo-constructor`. Ideally it would be a real
constructor (with choice of defaultReadObject/readFields similar to
super), but that would require significant changes to the J