Changeset: c60ed0f6d91a
Author:ohair
Date: 2010-03-12 17:44 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/rev/c60ed0f6d91a
6934759: Add langtools testing to jprt control builds
Reviewed-by: jjg
! make/jprt.properties
OK, next round of review.
I changed my UTF-8 changes to be behavior-preserving,
removing any hint of controversy, and renamed the patch
to "utf8-twiddling".
I got Ulf in my head, and can't stop micro-optimizing.
I added a new micro-optimizing patch for Bits.java.
Please file a bug.
6934268: Bett
Changeset: bbd817429100
Author:jjg
Date: 2010-03-12 15:22 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/rev/bbd817429100
6934712: run langtools jtreg tests from top level test/Makefile
Reviewed-by: ohair
! test/Makefile
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:04, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Am 12.03.2010 02:46, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
> public static boolean isISOControl(int codePoint) {
> // Optimized form of:
> // (codePoint >= 0x && codePoint <= 0x001F) ||
> // (codePoint >= 0x007F && codePo
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 13:14, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Am 11.03.2010 20:38, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
> - Maybe better: "... using a single {...@code char}".
Done.
> - Why don't you like using the new isBMPCodePoint() for
> isSupplementaryCodePoint() and toUpperCaseCharArray() ?
I now use it for the
Changeset: bf6eb240e718
Author:ohair
Date: 2010-03-12 09:03 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/bf6eb240e718
6933294: Fix some test/Makefile issues around Linux ARCH settings, better
defaults
Reviewed-by: jjg
! test/Makefile
! test/ProblemList.txt
Changeset: cda
Changeset: f856c0942c06
Author:jjg
Date: 2010-03-12 12:00 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/f856c0942c06
6934224: update langtools/test/Makefile
Reviewed-by: ohair
! make/jprt.properties
! test/Makefile
Filed bug 6934585
-kto
On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:06 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I'm having problems with this test on Solaris 10 X86 and Fedora 9
32bit.
Ring any bells?
-kto
I haven't seen this failure but looking at the test now, the connect
can fail immediately which woul
Hi Martin,
is that 666 a fake bug id?
I still can't see it in the public bugparade:
* This bug is not available.
More information is available at
-http://developers.sun.com/resources/bugsFAQ.html#s4q2
-Ulf
Am 11.03.2010 20:38, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
Ulf, your changes woul
Am 12.03.2010 02:46, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MqExtension
http://hgbook.red-bean.com/read/managing-change-with-mercurial-queues.html
Ah, I see mq is part of hg. Another thing to learn, but sounds good.
Unfortunately there seems no GUI for it. I run Tortois
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I'm having problems with this test on Solaris 10 X86 and Fedora 9 32bit.
Ring any bells?
-kto
I haven't seen this failure but looking at the test now, the connect can
fail immediately which would cause both of the test failures - can you
create a bug and I'll fix this.
-A
11 matches
Mail list logo
