Hi Kevin,
You're probably the only one on this list who has
seriously read the paper. It is not surprising that
taking a research paper into production would
discover bugs - the research never had to undergo
rigorous testing. (I like the Java culture of
combining spec + implementation + test sui
Renamed to IndexOf-javadoc
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/IndexOf-javadoc/
Martin
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 15:36, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 14:35, Xueming Shen wrote:
>>
>> CR 6940381 Created, P4 java/classes_lang Wording improvements for
>> String.index
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 14:35, Xueming Shen wrote:
>
> CR 6940381 Created, P4 java/classes_lang Wording improvements for
> String.indexOf, String.lastIndexOf
>
> Since it's a simple rewording, I would not expect a CCC is necessary.
>
> Please do it separately.
>
> Seems like the "is true." line is
Am 31.03.2010 22:54, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 13:41, Ulf Zibis wrote:
You remember on UTF-8 twiddling:
Am 16.03.2010 22:51, schrieb Ulf Zibis:
Am 16.03.2010 21:57, schrieb Martin Buchholz:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:48, Ulf Zibiswrote:
I think an object oriented language like Java should not contain a class
where there are so many different candidate names for its fields. It's a
code smell for improper abstraction.
There are lots of classes that are structurally similar but they are defined
in different classes as they are abstra
