Hi David and Martin,
Thanks so much for your time (heh, punny) and thoughts, and for taking the ball
and running with it.
cheers,
jon
- "David Holmes" wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Martin Buchholz said the following on 07/08/10 15:38:
> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 18:08, David Holmes
> wrote:
- "Martin Buchholz" wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:05, wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Thanks for your input.
> >
> > - "Martin Buchholz" wrote:
> >
> >> It's not at all clear that one cannot solve the y2038 problem on
> >> systems with a 32-bit time_t.
> >> That's what Michael Schw
Hi Martin,
Martin Buchholz said the following on 07/08/10 15:38:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 18:08, David Holmes wrote:
I think there has been some confusion here. It seems to me that the
anti-inlining that is being referred to is javac's "inlining" of
compile-time constants - BUT that doesn't appl
