hg: jdk7/tl/langtools: 5 new changesets

2010-08-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: fc7219517ec1 Author:cl Date: 2010-07-29 13:33 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/fc7219517ec1 Added tag jdk7-b103 for changeset bd85271c580c ! .hgtags Changeset: 49489c1d8fae Author:cl Date: 2010-08-06 12:52 -0700 URL: http://hg.o

hg: jdk7/tl/hotspot: 20 new changesets

2010-08-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: efd4401fab1d Author:cl Date: 2010-07-29 13:33 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/hotspot/rev/efd4401fab1d Added tag jdk7-b103 for changeset cb4250ef73b2 ! .hgtags Changeset: e7ec8cd4dd8a Author:tonyp Date: 2010-06-28 14:13 -0400 URL: http://hg.

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 21 new changesets

2010-08-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: b839344245a9 Author:cl Date: 2010-07-29 13:33 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/b839344245a9 Added tag jdk7-b103 for changeset 6488b70a23cc ! .hgtags Changeset: 6950da80c75c Author:ohair Date: 2010-08-02 16:31 -0700 URL: http://hg.open

hg: jdk7/tl/jaxws: 2 new changesets

2010-08-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: bbc4cce6c20a Author:cl Date: 2010-07-29 13:33 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxws/rev/bbc4cce6c20a Added tag jdk7-b103 for changeset 267386d6b923 ! .hgtags Changeset: 39eb4f3031f4 Author:cl Date: 2010-08-06 12:52 -0700 URL: http://hg.openj

hg: jdk7/tl/jaxp: 2 new changesets

2010-08-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: d42c4acb6424 Author:cl Date: 2010-07-29 13:33 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxp/rev/d42c4acb6424 Added tag jdk7-b103 for changeset b7722e878864 ! .hgtags Changeset: 3233b9a4c12e Author:cl Date: 2010-08-06 12:51 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjd

hg: jdk7/tl/corba: 2 new changesets

2010-08-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: 9607213481d4 Author:cl Date: 2010-07-29 13:33 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/corba/rev/9607213481d4 Added tag jdk7-b103 for changeset 11e7678c3eb1 ! .hgtags Changeset: 6f21b030092f Author:cl Date: 2010-08-06 12:51 -0700 URL: http://hg.openj

hg: jdk7/tl: 2 new changesets

2010-08-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: f8be576feefc Author:cl Date: 2010-07-29 13:33 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/rev/f8be576feefc Added tag jdk7-b103 for changeset be2aedc4e3b1 ! .hgtags Changeset: 9f96a4269d77 Author:cl Date: 2010-08-06 12:51 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.jav

Re: Code review request: 6973831 NPE when printing stack trace of OOME

2010-08-12 Thread Mandy Chung
David Holmes wrote: Hi Mandy, Mandy Chung said the following on 08/13/10 09:22: On 08/12/10 12:00, Rémi Forax wrote: The "detailMessage" is not final because the VM in fact preallocates Throwable object (OOME and ArithmeticException) and then sets the 'detailMessage' field directly (as the c

Re: Code review request: 6973831 NPE when printing stack trace of OOME

2010-08-12 Thread David Holmes
Hi Mandy, Mandy Chung said the following on 08/13/10 09:22: On 08/12/10 12:00, Rémi Forax wrote: The "detailMessage" is not final because the VM in fact preallocates Throwable object (OOME and ArithmeticException) and then sets the 'detailMessage' field directly (as the constructor is not inv

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2010-08-12 Thread mandy . chung
Changeset: 389bc53d0945 Author:mchung Date: 2010-08-12 16:36 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/389bc53d0945 6973831: NPE when printing stack trace of OOME Summary: Initialize suppressedExceptions field to null Reviewed-by: briangoetz, dholmes, forax ! src/share/

Re: Code review request: 6973831 NPE when printing stack trace of OOME

2010-08-12 Thread Mandy Chung
David, Brian, Remi, Thanks for the review. On 08/12/10 12:00, Rémi Forax wrote: The "detailMessage" is not final because the VM in fact preallocates Throwable object (OOME and ArithmeticException) and then sets the 'detailMessage' field directly (as the constructor is not invoked). I am p

Re: Code review request: 6973831 NPE when printing stack trace of OOME

2010-08-12 Thread Brian Goetz
So, this aspect of COIN is still somewhat new, and so I think it is worth looking at carefully. There is a specification for this feature that was discussed on coin-dev. You might want to take a look and comment -- its not too late. On Aug 12, 2010, at 5:00 PM, David Holmes wrote: > Mandy Ch

Re: Code review request: 6973831 NPE when printing stack trace of OOME

2010-08-12 Thread David Holmes
Mandy Chung said the following on 08/13/10 04:29: On 08/11/10 18:26, David Holmes wrote: I'm a bit behind on this functionality as I have no ideas what a suppressed exception is. :) FWIW. The suppressed exceptions are added for automatic resource management (6911258). http://mail.openj

hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6971825: (so) improve scatter/gather implementation

2010-08-12 Thread alan . bateman
Changeset: 11ee8b471f9c Author:alanb Date: 2010-08-12 19:53 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/11ee8b471f9c 6971825: (so) improve scatter/gather implementation Reviewed-by: chegar, sherman ! src/share/classes/sun/nio/ch/DatagramChannelImpl.java ! src/share/classe

Re: Code review request: 6973831 NPE when printing stack trace of OOME

2010-08-12 Thread Rémi Forax
Le 12/08/2010 20:29, Mandy Chung a écrit : On 08/11/10 18:26, David Holmes wrote: I'm a bit behind on this functionality as I have no ideas what a suppressed exception is. :) FWIW. The suppressed exceptions are added for automatic resource management (6911258). http://mail.openjdk.java

Re: Code review request: 6973831 NPE when printing stack trace of OOME

2010-08-12 Thread Mandy Chung
On 08/11/10 18:26, David Holmes wrote: I'm a bit behind on this functionality as I have no ideas what a suppressed exception is. :) FWIW. The suppressed exceptions are added for automatic resource management (6911258). http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/coin-dev/2009-February/11

Re: jsr166y/openjdk resync

2010-08-12 Thread David Holmes
Hi Doug, I could be mistaken but at this stage I don't think new API changes have any additional overhead. Coordinating the code changes and test changes is the biggest issue. David Doug Lea said the following on 08/12/10 10:24: A few months ago, we simplified some of the APIs to the ForkJ

Re: jsr166y/openjdk resync

2010-08-12 Thread Chris Hegarty
No problem Doug, I worked with Martin on the original jsr166y integration into JDK7 and can certainly help with these updates. -Chris. Doug Lea wrote: A few months ago, we simplified some of the APIs to the ForkJoin classes (mainly, removing some methods so as to allow better internal automat