Changeset: e3efbb250c0c
Author:xuelei
Date: 2011-03-15 23:13 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/e3efbb250c0c
7022855: Export "PKIX" as the standard algorithm name of KeyManagerFactory
Summary: export the existing "NewSunX509" algorithm implementation using the
st
Changeset: 8b7f0a3a0b2e
Author:xuelei
Date: 2011-03-15 23:08 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/8b7f0a3a0b2e
7025073: Stricter check on trust anchor makes VerifyCACerts.java test fail
Summary: loosen the check for version 1 and 2 X.509 certificate
Reviewed-by: mul
Changeset: 4a7da412db38
Author:valeriep
Date: 2011-03-15 18:42 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/4a7da412db38
7001933: Deadlock in java.lang.classloader.getPackage()
Summary: Modified to not holding the "packages" lock when calling parent CL.
Reviewed-by: dholmes
Changeset: 0f9e5b7f0d7e
Author:jjg
Date: 2011-03-15 11:48 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/0f9e5b7f0d7e
6988079: Errors reported via Messager.printMessage(ERROR,"error message") are
not tallied correctly
Reviewed-by: darcy
!
src/share/classes/com/sun/to
Changeset: edf03ca74991
Author:jjg
Date: 2011-03-15 11:41 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/edf03ca74991
6987384: -XprintProcessorRoundsInfo message printed with different timing than
previous
Reviewed-by: darcy
! test/tools/javac/lib/JavacTestingAbstract
Changeset: c9432f06d9bc
Author:jjg
Date: 2011-03-15 11:04 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/c9432f06d9bc
6993311: annotations on packages are not validated
Reviewed-by: mcimadamore
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/comp/Attr.java
! src/share/classes/
Hi Steve,
I was one of the people that provided feedback on Mike's patch. In my case, it
was a mishap of reply to sender vs. reply to all. I don't have the original
email but, the result are visible in the test case that Mike wrote. My main
concern with the old patch that if you use a raw
On Mar 15 2011, at 02:36 , Steve Poole wrote:
> On 14/03/11 21:02, Mike Duigou wrote:
>> I've gotten feedback regarding this issue and I've updated the webrev to use
>> the commented out compare(key, key) test rather than the previously
>> committed solution. I hadn't looked at the commented ou
On 14/03/11 21:02, Mike Duigou wrote:
I've gotten feedback regarding this issue and I've updated the webrev to use
the commented out compare(key, key) test rather than the previously committed
solution. I hadn't looked at the commented out code too carefully and had
assumed it was pseudo-code
