On 08/04/2011 09:09 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Mike Duigou wrote:
Looks good to me.
I did wonder if we have a policy for tracking fdlibm updates.
To a first approximation (and even a second approximation), fdlibm
doesn't have updates any more any hasn't for many years. The changes in
in
I like that idea. Should we open another discussion thread?
Colin Decker cgdec...@gmail.com schrieb:
One better way to handle this in Java 8 would be to have a utility method
that takes a SupplierEnumerationE SAM argument (with a no-arg method
that returns an EnumerationE) and returns an
I have two files: A.java and B.java
/*
* @test
* @build A B
* @run main A
*/
public class A {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Class.forName(B, true,
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader());
}
}
public class B {
}
Now jtreg A.java shows:
On Aug 5, 10:41am, a...@redhat.com (Andrew Haley) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: JDK 8 code review request for 7075098: Remove unused fdlibm f
| On 08/04/2011 09:09 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
|
| Mike Duigou wrote:
| Looks good to me.
|
| I did wonder if we have a policy for tracking fdlibm updates.
|
Here's the second version:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/7072353/2/webrev/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emduigou/7072353/2/webrev/
* Changed LdapResult.referrals to be a VectorVectorString;
* Refactored
o com/sun/jndi/dns/DnsContext.java: BaseNameClassPairEnumerationT;
o
Changeset: c0d5f93af048
Author:jjg
Date: 2011-08-05 15:57 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/c0d5f93af048
7074189: some javac tests fail with latest jtreg 4.1 b03
Reviewed-by: darcy
+ test/tools/javac/lib/CompileFail.java
!
