Approved for jdk7u-dev.
regards,
Sean.
On 18/10/2012 13:34, Kurchi Hazra wrote:
This is a request for approval to backport the fix for 7198073 from 8
to 7u12.
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7198073
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~khazra/7198073/7u12/webrev/
Thi
Hi Martin,
On 19/10/2012 10:58 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/source/browse/guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/testing/GcFinalization.java
That code uses runFinalization in places which means it is not
exercising the primary finalization mechanism. But lo
Hi Christos
You mean the exception thrown in NativeGSSFactory.java lines 52-60?
Vector creds = GSSUtil.searchSubject
(name, mech, initiate, GSSCredElement.class);
// If Subject is present but no native creds available
if (creds != null && creds.isEmpty()) {
http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/source/browse/guava-testlib/src/com/google/common/testing/GcFinalization.java
Hi Chris,
On 19/10/2012 8:37 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Oct 18, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Just curious - the test runs with a max of 10 GCs. You
reproduced this bug on a slower machine with fastdebug build.
If you increase the max number of GCs, I wonder how long
the test wil
On Oct 18, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
> On 10/18/2012 3:37 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>
>>> Just curious - the test runs with a max of 10 GCs. You
>>> reproduced this bug on a slower machine with fastdebug build.
>>> If you increase the max number of GCs, I wonder how long
>>> th
On 10/18/2012 3:37 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Just curious - the test runs with a max of 10 GCs. You
reproduced this bug on a slower machine with fastdebug build.
If you increase the max number of GCs, I wonder how long
the test will take to complete/pass?
Around 14 GCs (runtime with -Xcom
Hi Christian,
Thanks for taking on this bug.
Just curious - the test runs with a max of 10 GCs. You
reproduced this bug on a slower machine with fastdebug build.
If you increase the max number of GCs, I wonder how long
the test will take to complete/pass?
With your fix, how many GC does it take
On Oct 18, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for taking on this bug.
Sure. I'm trying to get HotSpot nightly failures down.
>
> Just curious - the test runs with a max of 10 GCs. You
> reproduced this bug on a slower machine with fastdebug build.
> If you incre
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/6771058
6771058: TEST_BUG: java/lang/ref/Basic.java may fail with -server -Xcomp
Reviewed-by:
This test can fail if finalizer of Basic is not called for some
reason. It happens in compiled mode if compilation is more slow than
execution of the main loop.
The f
On 10/18/2012 07:43 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/10/2012 03:10, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi
Webrev has been updated with following changes
(1) added a pair of en/decode(ByteBuffer src, ByteBuffer dst) methods
(2) some minor spec clarification regarding the "end of decoding"
(3) performance tuning.
(Forwarding to security-dev as this should be discussed in that group, not
core-libs).
On 10/18/12 5:02 PM, chris...@zoulas.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This simple fix allows kerberos authentication to work with:
>
> -Dsun.security.jgss.native=true
>
> and microsoft's sqljdbc 4.0.2206.100 dr
Hello,
This simple fix allows kerberos authentication to work with:
-Dsun.security.jgss.native=true
and microsoft's sqljdbc 4.0.2206.100 driver.
Enjoy,
christos
--- a/java/src/sun/security/jgss/GSSUtil.java Mon Oct 15 17:43:08 2012 -0400
+++ b/java/src/sun/security/jgss/GSSUtil.java
This is a request for approval to backport the fix for 7198073 from 8 to
7u12.
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7198073
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~khazra/7198073/7u12/webrev/
This change been reviewed by Alan Bateman [1] and the fix has been
pushed into jdk8 [
I wonder if there would be advantage in using a SharedSecrets mechanism to
allow construction of a String directly from a char array. The intermediate
byte array seems wasteful especially for what is likely to be a heavily used
path.
Mike
On Oct 17 2012, at 19:10 , Xueming Shen wrote:
> Hi
>
Michael,
The current approach assumes that the base64 en/decoding of a file, stream
will be handled by the en/decoder.wrap(...). The en/decode(bb, bb) is
basically
for one time invocation input and output from/to existing buffers, with the
hope of avoiding the coding-life-circle management, so
Am 18.10.2012 04:10, schrieb Xueming Shen:
> Hi
>
> Webrev has been updated with following changes
>
> (1) added a pair of en/decode(ByteBuffer src, ByteBuffer dst) methods
I think line 443 needs an additional check for atom == 0. Same for the
array case. At least if you do not want an endOfInpu
Am 18.10.2012 16:04, schrieb Xueming Shen:
On 10/18/2012 6:19 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Oops, you are working at 6 in the morning?
Hi Sherman,
you could create the code table by help of a String constant, which would speed up the loading
and save a little footprint on the class file. (you have
On 10/18/12 7:43 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/10/2012 03:10, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi
Webrev has been updated with following changes
(1) added a pair of en/decode(ByteBuffer src, ByteBuffer dst) methods
(2) some minor spec clarification regarding the "end of decoding"
(3) performance tuning.
w
On 18/10/2012 03:10, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi
Webrev has been updated with following changes
(1) added a pair of en/decode(ByteBuffer src, ByteBuffer dst) methods
(2) some minor spec clarification regarding the "end of decoding"
(3) performance tuning.
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman
On 18/10/2012 14:19, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi Sherman,
you could create the code table by help of a String constant, which
would speed up the loading and save a little footprint on the class
file. (you have forgotten those tricks from sun.nio.cs coders? ;-) )
But my main question:
Why don't you e
On 10/18/2012 6:19 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi Sherman,
you could create the code table by help of a String constant, which
would speed up the loading and save a little footprint on the class
file. (you have forgotten those tricks from sun.nio.cs coders? ;-) )
The implementation probably needs
Hi Sherman,
you could create the code table by help of a String constant, which would speed up the loading and
save a little footprint on the class file. (you have forgotten those tricks from sun.nio.cs coders?
;-) )
But my main question:
Why don't you enqueue those coders in the well known s
Changeset: 3f62cfc4e83d
Author:xuelei
Date: 2012-10-18 01:14 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/3f62cfc4e83d
7068321: Support TLS Server Name Indication (SNI) Extension in JSSE Server
Reviewed-by: mullan, weijun, wetmore
! src/share/classes/javax/net/ssl/Extended
24 matches
Mail list logo