Hi everyone,
Christian Törnqvist has done a great job to make it easier to run
multi-process tests in jtreg. His webrev
(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ctornqvi/webrev/8006413/webrev.03/) is
already approved and on the way into the hotspot repo.
This webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ykantser/
Hi all,
this is a refactoring of the I/O trace instrumentation that's going into JDK
7u14. The fix is only applicable to jdk7 since the corresponding code does not
yet
exist in jdk8.
Bug: 8006757: Refactor Socket and File I/O tracing
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8006757
On 2013-01-23, at 1:14 AM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
> Personally, optimizing for interpreter (or even C1) doesn't seem worth it.
> If something's truly hot and best perf is desired then use C2 or tiered. If
> the method isn't hot enough to trigger the C2 threshold, then why bother?
> You're
This is a design/spec question, so should be discussed on
enhanced-metadata-spec-discuss, not core-libs-dev.
Alex
On 1/24/2013 11:33 AM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
The current version of the spec for parameter reflection, found here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~abuckley/8misc.pdf
states that if a
Please review this JEP I'd like to propose for Java SE 8.
Bob Vandette
Java SE Embedded Architect
Resending, mailer stripped out my attachment.
Please review this JEP I'd like to propose for Java SE 8.
Bob Vandette
Java SE Embedded Architect
Title: Add support for static JNI libraries
Author: Bob
Just take a brief look at the codes. It seems the library can launch a
Java process, wait for it to finish, and collect all the output (stdout
and stderr). Is that all?
I would be glad if it supports manipulating the stdin, i.e. simulating
input to a process. For example, I sometimes need to s
Consider importing the popular GcFinalization
https://cs.corp.google.com/#google3/java/com/google/common/testing/GcFinalization.java&sq=package:google3%20-file:%5Eexperimental&q=gcfinalization&type=cs&l=61
as a testing utility for the jdk proper.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Alan Bateman wrote
[ email address fail: jdk-core-libs-dev_ww_...@oracle.com]
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> I don't have time for a detailed review, but I have some high-level
> comments.
>
> A lot of this is good functionality that should be provided in the jdk
> proper,
> notably gett
I don't use these netbeans projects, but the changes seem fine to me.
The copyright on the new files says 2007, I assume they need to say 2013?
-kto
On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> This issue still needs a reviewer.
>
> Mike
>
> On Jan 22 2013, at 13:27 , Mike Duigou wrote:
This issue still needs a reviewer.
Mike
On Jan 22 2013, at 13:27 , Mike Duigou wrote:
> Hello all;
>
> This is a patch that has been lingering around in the lambda/lambda repo for
> a long time. It adds minimal support for the MacOSX platform to the JDK
> NetBeans projects. It could also be u
Hello,
Please review my refactoring of a regression test for the
java.lang.reflect.Parameter feature:
8007115: Refactor regression tests for java.lang.reflect.Parameter
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8007115.0/
The new approach is to encode the expected information in annotations
Good work Steven!
Some initial comments;
- The changes to Long should be in a separate issue. It's generally encouraged
for changesets to focus on only one change. Sorry, yes, it's additional
overhead.
- I would like to see if performed of toString() can be improved further by
using String(c
OK, I shall label the issue accordingly.
Thanks,
Brian
On Jan 30, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Looks fine. I think not have a regression test for this is okay since it
> would take a relatively long time to run and use a significant amount of
> memory.
Hi Brian,
Looks fine. I think not have a regression test for this is okay since
it would take a relatively long time to run and use a significant amount
of memory.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 01/30/2013 10:34 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Please review at your convenience.
Issue: JDK-6471906
Assessm
Please review at your convenience.
Issue: JDK-6471906
Assessment:
The problem occurs because an attempt is made to allocate an array of length >
Integer.MAX_VALUE.
Proposed solution:
--- a/src/share/classes/java/math/BigDecimal.java Fri Jan 25 12:25:10
2013 -0800
+++ b/src/share/class
Changeset: c924291865e5
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-01-30 09:47 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/c924291865e5
8007034: debug printer for javac internals
Reviewed-by: mcimadamore
+ test/tools/javac/lib/DPrinter.java
Changeset: 950d8195a5a4
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-01-30 09:40 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/950d8195a5a4
8007096: DocLint parsing problems with some comments
Reviewed-by: mcimadamore
! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/parser/DocCommentParser.java
! sr
Hi Alan!
Thank you for your help.
TL;DR version:
Strictly speaking (going only by the specifications), this could give us
false positives, but I believe this is VERY unlikely to actually happen
in real life.
Long version:
Yes, I gave this some thought myself. For example, on JRockit, if th
On 29/01/2013 23:36, David Buck wrote:
Hi!
This is a review request to add only the test case for the following
OracleJDK issue :
[ 7042126 : (alt-rt) HashMap.clone implementation should be re-examined ]
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7042126
* please note: I just marked
Hi Frank,
Probably best to confirm this on lambda-dev but I suspect that default
method support introduced a bug in b63 that was fixed by b65.
David
On 30/01/2013 12:06 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi guys,
I noticed there is a change in Java 8 between b63 and b65. The change
can be illustrated by
21 matches
Mail list logo
