Hi Chris,
Didn't Doug's changes also remove the constraint:
"The algorithm requires a working space equal to the size of the
original array."
?
David
On 8/05/2013 12:51 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Doug has made some updates to the java.util.Arrays sorting code to
provide stable sorting. There
2013/5/7 9:46 -0700, brian.go...@oracle.com:
> With
>
> changeset: 7058:6feee75b0a8b
> summary: 8012664: Add tests for java.util.stream and lambda translation
>
> we now have the lion's share of the java.util.stream code and tests put
> back into the JDK8 repositories (16+ KLoC of new code
With
changeset: 7058:6feee75b0a8b
summary: 8012664: Add tests for java.util.stream and lambda translation
we now have the lion's share of the java.util.stream code and tests put
back into the JDK8 repositories (16+ KLoC of new code and 15+ KLoC of
new tests, with nearly 100% coverage)*.
Changeset: 6feee75b0a8b
Author:briangoetz
Date: 2013-05-06 11:43 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/6feee75b0a8b
8012664: Add tests for java.util.stream and lambda translation
Reviewed-by: mduigou, briangoetz
Contributed-by: Brian Goetz , Paul Sandoz
, Mike Duigo
Changeset: 43c2f7cb9c76
Author:jjg
Date: 2013-05-07 14:27 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/43c2f7cb9c76
8004082: test/tools/javac/plugin/showtype/Test.java fails on windows: jtreg
can't delete plugin.jar
Reviewed-by: vromero, mcimadamore
! src/share/clas
On 5/7/13, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
> On 5/7/2013 7:15 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
> I think I will leave it as-is, jexec, it appears may not be needed, this
> was added for
> Solaris primarily, and I am not sure if this is required anymore (as
> Alan pointed out earlier),
> I need to research this
Changeset: fe4e9bc2186f
Author:mduigou
Date: 2013-05-07 12:05 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/fe4e9bc2186f
4802647: Throw required NPEs from removeAll()/retainAll()
Reviewed-by: mduigou, chegar, dholmes
Contributed-by: Brandon Passanisi
! src/share/classes/ja
Alan,
On May 7, 2013, at 2:33 AM, Alan Eliasen wrote:
>> My rationale for attempting a larger review was that if these new
>> changes were not examined now, then they will likely miss the JDK 8
>> train altogether. On the other hand if time were to run out on a
>> large review then there would be
On 5/7/2013 7:42 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 05/01/2013 01:00 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/185
Are other robustness improvements out of scope?
Yes, JAXP MR 1.5 is focused on external references.
The "Schema Component Constraint: Unique Particl
Changeset: e30396e22c6f
Author:naoto
Date: 2013-05-07 11:31 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e30396e22c6f
8013086: NPE thrown by SimpleDateFormat with TimeZoneNameProvider supplied
Reviewed-by: okutsu
! src/share/classes/sun/util/locale/provider/TimeZoneNameUti
On 5/7/2013 7:15 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
On 5/6/2013 7:38 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
This looks good.
There's one check I found confusing.
175 if (alen <= 0 || alen > INT_MAX / sizeof(char *)) {
Not that it matters much, but I'm not sure exactly what you're trying
to check here.
If yo
Changeset: 100027950b05
Author:sla
Date: 2013-05-07 20:00 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/100027950b05
8004007: test/sun/tools/jinfo/Basic.sh fails on when runSA is set to true
Reviewed-by: alanb, dsamersoff
! test/sun/tools/jinfo/Basic.sh
Changeset: 7b40394ad944
Author:sla
Date: 2013-05-07 19:57 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7b40394ad944
6980985: java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/ResetPeakMemoryUsage is not robust
when getMax() returns -1
7181907: TEST_BUG: j/l/management/MemoryMXBean/ResetPe
On 05/07/2013 05:04 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
The "currently" MIN_ARRAY_SORT_GRAN statement bothers me. Can we remove
currently?
No problem. That would read...
"When the sub-array length reaches a {@linlplain #MIN_ARRAY_SORT_GRAN
minimum granularity}, the sub-array is sorted using the appr
The "currently" MIN_ARRAY_SORT_GRAN statement bothers me. Can we remove
currently? I would expect to see currently if the numerical value of
MIN_ARRAY_SORT_GRAN was presented. We may change the threshold but we're
otherwise committed to the constant name for the threshold.
Mike
On May 7 2013,
Good suggestion, thank you.
Mike
On May 7 2013, at 06:36 , Jason Mehrens wrote:
> Mike,
>
> EmptyNavigableMap and EmptyNavigableSet should contain the static final
> references themselves and not the Collections class. That way they load on
> demand and not with the Collections class. Use d
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 16:10 +0200, Peter Levart wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 03:26 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > There is a message emitted by the VM reading "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
> > thrown from the UncaughtExceptionHandler in thread "Reference Handler""
> > that is sufficient to de
Thomas Schatzl skrev 7/5/13 3:26 PM:
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:12 +0200, Peter Levart wrote:
On 05/07/2013 09:51 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 12:31 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
Catching ThreadDeath is futile. If someone is invoking stop() then you
can encounter th
Doug has made some updates to the java.util.Arrays sorting code to
provide stable sorting. There have also been some changes to the
original Parallel Array Sorting ( MIN_ARRAY_SORT_GRAN is public again ).
Right now a copy of this work is sitting in the lambda repo. This issue
proposed to integ
On 05/01/2013 01:00 AM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/185
Are other robustness improvements out of scope?
The "Schema Component Constraint: Unique Particle Attribution" comes to
my mind, which is currently not enforced by OpenJDK.
--
Florian Weimer / R
On 5/6/2013 7:38 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
This looks good.
There's one check I found confusing.
175 if (alen <= 0 || alen > INT_MAX / sizeof(char *)) {
Not that it matters much, but I'm not sure exactly what you're trying
to check here.
If you're trying to check that argc+2 doesn't overf
On 05/07/2013 03:26 PM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:12 +0200, Peter Levart wrote:
On 05/07/2013 09:51 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 12:31 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
Catching ThreadDeath is futile. If someone is invoking stop() then you
can enc
Mike,
EmptyNavigableMap and EmptyNavigableSet should contain the static final
references themselves and not the Collections class. That way they load on
demand and not with the Collections class. Use default visibility inside the
inner class so the compiler doesn't generate method to promote
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:12 +0200, Peter Levart wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 09:51 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 12:31 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
> >> Catching ThreadDeath is futile. If someone is invoking stop() then you
> >> can encounter the ThreadDeath anywh
On 05/07/2013 09:51 AM, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 12:31 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
Catching ThreadDeath is futile. If someone is invoking stop() then you
can encounter the ThreadDeath anywhere and it is impossible to write
completely robust code in the face of such an
Changeset: 2602eab5f086
Author:dfuchs
Date: 2013-05-07 11:35 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/2602eab5f086
8008738: Issue in com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.serializer.Encodings causes
some JCK tests to fail intermittently
Summary: Encodings.java sometimes crea
Changeset: 452e1a182907
Author:dfuchs
Date: 2013-05-06 18:50 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/452e1a182907
8008738: Issue in com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.serializer.Encodings causes
some JCK tests to fail intermittently
Summary: Encodings.java sometimes cre
> On May 4, 2013, at 5:13 AM, Alan Eliasen wrote:
>> If you're feeling overwhelmed by the magnitude of the changes to
>> BigInteger, I would very strongly suggest that you review it in
>> stages. This e-mail proposes stages for the review of this patch.
On 05/06/2013 02:47 PM, Brian Burkhalter
On 5/7/2013 12:49 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/05/2013 08:39, huizhe wang wrote:
:
:
- DocumentBuilderFactory still says that SAXException is throw by
DocumentBuilderFactory.
Yes, that's what's in the jaxp1.3/1.4 spec unfortunately. Both DOM
and SAX throws SAXException. It should have
Changeset: 9c9b2385c1b0
Author:jfranck
Date: 2013-05-07 09:52 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9c9b2385c1b0
8013541: Revise javadoc for Executable.getAnnotatedReturnType()
Reviewed-by: abuckley, darcy
! src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Executable.java
On 07/05/2013 08:39, huizhe wang wrote:
:
:
- DocumentBuilderFactory still says that SAXException is throw by
DocumentBuilderFactory.
Yes, that's what's in the jaxp1.3/1.4 spec unfortunately. Both DOM and
SAX throws SAXException. It should have defined a DOMException for DOM
operations.
Hi all,
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 12:31 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
> Catching ThreadDeath is futile. If someone is invoking stop() then you
> can encounter the ThreadDeath anywhere and it is impossible to write
> completely robust code in the face of such an async exception. So please
> let's not e
On 5/6/2013 11:46 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 06/05/2013 18:49, huizhe wang wrote:
:
True. I've added 176 new tests. JCK team is also testing using the
current build of JAXP RI. I will also run regression tests.
The new webrev included fixes to a couple of test failures in the
last JPRT bui
33 matches
Mail list logo
