Am 20.07.2013 03:41, schrieb Mandy Chung:
Hi Jochen,
I read through the thread in mlvm-dev [1] that has a good discussion
there. I have filed a RFE:
8020785: caller-sensitive methods to skip dynamic generated frames
and look up the true caller
This seems that java.lang.instrument might be
Hi Peter,
I have been very busy on other high priority works and didn't have time
to look into this request. I filed 8020968 and 8020785 so that others
can help follow up and follow up (I'll be on vacation this Wed).
Class.getCallerClass and @CallerSensitive is clearly one option to
replace
On 7/22/2013 3:37 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
Am 20.07.2013 03:41, schrieb Mandy Chung:
Hi Jochen,
I read through the thread in mlvm-dev [1] that has a good discussion
there. I have filed a RFE:
8020785: caller-sensitive methods to skip dynamic generated frames
and look up the true calle
Hi,
On 2013-07-19, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't been able to find any info on this.
> but is [Class|AnnotatedMember].getAnnotations() required to return the
> annotations is order of declaration?
>
> For example, if I have the following definition
> @First
> @Second
> public class F
Thank you Joel for all the valuable feedback.
Test have been refactored and here comes the updated version:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5812451/yl153753/7184826/webrev.01/index.html
Thanks,
Amy
On 7/10/13 10:17 PM, Joel Borggren-Franck wrote:
Hi Amy, Tristan,
I'm not a Reviewer kind
Hi Amy,
I'm happy with the current iteration. I'll help you find an official
reviewer.
cheers
/Joel
On 2013-07-22, Amy Lu wrote:
> Thank you Joel for all the valuable feedback.
>
> Test have been refactored and here comes the updated version:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5812451/yl1537
Changeset: dcd89e60051a
Author:khazra
Date: 2013-07-22 15:24 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/dcd89e60051a
8020498: Crash when both libnet.so and libmawt.so are loaded
Reviewed-by: chegar, dsamersoff
! src/share/native/java/net/net_util.c
Changeset: a3a2889b10
Hi Ivan,
I'm concerned about the change in behavior for the existing working cases.
How many times are the bytes copied in your proposed implementation?
How many arrays are allocated and discarded?
Files.copy() uses an extra array for the copies.
BAOS should only be used for size == 0; that wo
I find this issue tangentially related to some open source logging
libraries. Some create a stack trace just so they can get the name of the
calling Class instance.
Example:
Logger log = Logger.createLogger(); // for the current class
Are there any thoughts to directly exposing
sun.reflect.Reflec
On 07/22/2013 11:19 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, roger riggs wrote:
Hi Ivan,
I'm concerned about the change in behavior for the existing working cases.
How many times are the bytes copied in your proposed implementation?
How many arrays are allocated and discar
On 07/22/2013 11:22 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
I find this issue tangentially related to some open source logging
libraries. Some create a stack trace just so they can get the name of the
calling Class instance.
Example:
Logger log = Logger.createLogger(); // for the current class
Are there any t
Hi,
All I was thinking was:
if (size == 0) {
use BAOS... code from 1st webrev.
} else {
current code
}
But I am curious why fixing the size() method is not a better fix; if
FileChannel
can return incorrect values that seems like a more serious flaw in the
implementa
That's true David. I concur with your description.
I was just more interested in the fact that Java has the calling Class
available, but there's no API that exposes it. Many developers kind of
groan they always have to explicitly specify the current class name through
the language.
private static
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator you must also supply a size. This
addition allows use of the default size which is good for two reason; you don't
have to specify a fixed value and the implementati
looks fine Mike
Best
Lance
On Jul 22, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
> Hello all;
>
> A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
> Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator you must also supply a size.
> This addition allows use of the default size whic
Hello all;
This is a minor update to the java.util.function package. There is only one
normative change, Consumer.chain() -> Consumer.andThen() but many textual
improvements.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8019840/0/webrev/
One change to note: I have reverted the change to the block c
On 07/22/2013 09:42 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
looks fine Mike
Best
Lance
Yes, fine for me too.
Rémi
On Jul 22, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator
On 22/07/2013 20:24, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
A simple rewiew for the addition of another constructor to PriorityQueue.
Currently if you wish to specify a Comparator you must also supply a size. This
addition allows use of the default size which is good for two reason; you don't
have to
Mike,
I know the description is pulled from the previous constructor, but both
sound a bit awkward. Both can probably benefit from an improvement.
Currently:
"Creates a {@code PriorityQueue} with the default initial capacity that
orders its elements according to the specified comparator."
Depend
Changeset: a6cbb9808e4b
Author:mduigou
Date: 2013-07-22 12:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a6cbb9808e4b
6799426: Adds constructor PriorityQueue(Comparator)
Reviewed-by: lancea
! src/share/classes/java/util/PriorityQueue.java
Reasonable comment but unfortunately missed my push by mere seconds. I've made
a note to correct the docs but will likely wait for some other issue to
incorporate it.
Mike
On Jul 22 2013, at 14:00 , Paul Benedict wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I know the description is pulled from the previous constructo
Good; 'andThen' is a more productive[1] term than 'chain'.
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity_(linguistics)
— John
An updated webrev is in the same location:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/6476168/.
On Jul 19, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Joseph Darcy wrote:
> A spec quibble "decimal separator" isn't really the appropriate term for the
> hex formatting.
I've changed this in the verbiage on lines 613 and 1376 of Form
Hi Brian,
Almost there! A few additional comments.
On 7/22/2013 4:47 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
An updated webrev is in the same location:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/6476168/.
On Jul 19, 2013, at 5:38 PM, Joseph Darcy wrote:
A spec quibble "decimal separator" isn't really the appropri
Changeset: 7716beb127d4
Author:darcy
Date: 2013-07-22 22:11 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7716beb127d4
8021109: Add serialVersionUID to LambdaConversionException.java
Reviewed-by: jrose
! src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/LambdaConversionException.java
25 matches
Mail list logo
