Question about FileSystemProvider API in JDK7

2013-10-20 Thread Pisarev, Vitaliy
Hello, I was directed to this list by Brian Goetz, I am a new member and I am not yet acquainted with how things go in these mailing lists. I am an SW Engineer and I am looking for some insight about the new FileSystemProvider API. I posted a question on SO: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8025631: Enhance Lambda construction

2013-10-20 Thread robert . field
Changeset: 71ecbde5e5e4 Author:rfield Date: 2013-10-20 18:07 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/71ecbde5e5e4 8025631: Enhance Lambda construction Reviewed-by: ksrini, ahgross ! src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/InnerClassLambdaMetafactory.java - src/share/classe

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8026931: MethodParameters tests failing on Windows

2013-10-20 Thread kumar . x . srinivasan
Changeset: 399c738e5103 Author:ksrini Date: 2013-10-20 12:54 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/399c738e5103 8026931: MethodParameters tests failing on Windows Reviewed-by: jjg, vromero ! test/tools/javac/MethodParameters/Tester.java

Re: RFR: 8026504: [asm] update internal ASM to the Beta version

2013-10-20 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
PING Hello, As per Nashorn teams request, I have also run the octane test, and it passes. I need reviewers from Lambda, Nashorn and ASM projects to approve this. Thanks Kumar Hello, Please review refreshing the internal ASM sources to ASM_5_0_BETA, I have run all the lambda test-ng test

Re: RFR 8020802: Need an ability to create jar files that are invariant to the pack200 packing/unpacking

2013-10-20 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Hi Alex, This looks good. Hi Sherman, Alan, Could one of you review this, please The "-n" options seems okay but I wonder if there has any thought given to having an option on jarsigner to normalize it before signing? The PM requirement was for jar, in that when a jar is created it sho

Re: RFR (S) CR 6857566: (bf) DirectByteBuffer garbage creation can outpace reclamation

2013-10-20 Thread Peter Levart
On 10/07/2013 10:36 PM, Peter Levart wrote: The back-off before retrying looks good, I just wonder if 1ms is too low to start with. The tests show that in majority of calls (at least on fast CPUs), thread does not sleep at all and if it really must sleep, a single sleep(1) is usually enoug

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8026791: wrong type_path encoded for method_return on an inner class constructor

2013-10-20 Thread jonathan . gibbons
Changeset: ae4f5cb78ebd Author:jjg Date: 2013-10-20 12:46 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/ae4f5cb78ebd 8026791: wrong type_path encoded for method_return on an inner class constructor Reviewed-by: jjg Contributed-by: wdi...@gmail.com ! src/share/classes/

Re: RFR 8020802: Need an ability to create jar files that are invariant to the pack200 packing/unpacking

2013-10-20 Thread Alan Bateman
On 19/10/2013 16:14, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Hi Alex, This looks good. Hi Sherman, Alan, Could one of you review this, please The "-n" options seems okay but I wonder if there has any thought given to having an option on jarsigner to normalize it before signing? On the patch itself then I

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8025109: Better encapsulation for AnnotatedType

2013-10-20 Thread jonathan . gibbons
Changeset: e5d3cd43c85e Author:jjg Date: 2013-10-20 12:01 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/e5d3cd43c85e 8025109: Better encapsulation for AnnotatedType Reviewed-by: jjg Contributed-by: wdi...@gmail.com ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/code/Symbol.j

Re: RFR 8020802: Need an ability to create jar files that are invariant to the pack200 packing/unpacking

2013-10-20 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Martin, as for the documentation as to why this is required, I missed adding them last night, this is spelled out in several places since JDK5. See item #4 http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/pack200/pack-spec.html#tocGenQue See para #4 http://javaweb.us.oracle.com/java/re

RFR(S) : 8026818 : Defmeth failures with -mode invoke

2013-10-20 Thread David Chase
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8026818/webrev.01/ bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026818 problem: The report describes a number of problems, cause by 3 separate bugs. The first is a dupe of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016839 . The second is a fault in