On 12/21/2013 12:08 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 20/12/2013 23:03, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hello,
Please review the removal of ISA (Instruction Specific Architecture)
directories namely sparcv9, amd64
and the symlinks in these directories, this was provided to aid
transition to jdk8, where
Hi,
while running the jdk/jtreg tests for our ppc-aix-port I found a
problem for the demo/zipfs/basic.sh test on AIX:
Exception in thread main java.io.IOException: NOFOLLOW_LINKS is not
supported on this platform
at sun.nio.fs.UnixPath.openForAttributeAccess(UnixPath.java:773)
at
Some simple copyright year updates which should have been done during
the year when these corba files were touched. I hope to push to JDK 8
and then import the patch into JDK 9.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029231
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8029231/webrev/
Update copyright date on JAXP files in jdk8 repository edited in 2013.
This patch will be applied to JDK8 and 9 repositories.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029236
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~joehw/jdk8/8029236/webrev/
Thanks,
Joe
Looks ok assuming they were all modified
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 23, 2013, at 12:56 PM, huizhe wang huizhe.w...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks Lance! The patch were SQE-generated based on files changed in 2013.
Joe
On 12/23/2013 10:10 AM, Lance @ Oracle wrote:
Looks ok assuming they were all modified
http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gifLance
Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
The patch looks good.
Mandy
On 12/23/13 9:04 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Some simple copyright year updates which should have been done during
the year when these corba files were touched. I hope to push to JDK 8
and then import the patch into JDK 9.
The copyright date update looks fine.
Mandy
On 12/23/13 9:56 AM, huizhe wang wrote:
Update copyright date on JAXP files in jdk8 repository edited in 2013.
This patch will be applied to JDK8 and 9 repositories.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029236
Changeset: 5ca1b4c282b8
Author:ssides
Date: 2013-12-23 18:42 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/corba/rev/5ca1b4c282b8
8029231: Update copyright years for files in corba repository for 2013
Reviewed-by: mchung, coffeys
!
Hi David/Martin, could any one of you sponsor this change for me?
---
Thanks
kalyan
On 12/20/2013 10:28 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 21/12/2013 4:19 AM, srikalyan wrote:
Hi David, i retained only the changes to ITERS, ProbleMList.txt and
upstream changes by Doug Lea(as pointed by Martin), could
Changeset: 9a3986b21be4
Author:joehw
Date: 2013-12-23 11:26 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/9a3986b21be4
8029236: Update copyright year to match last edit in jdk8 jaxp repository for
2013
Reviewed-by: lancea, mchung
!
Hello,
I've been quiet because real life needed my attention.
Obviously, the Schoenhage-Strassen and Barrett algorithms are not going
to make it into JDK8. I hope that is not a problem for anyone. We
shouldn't use the word problem anyway but rather think of it as an
opportunity :-) for more
Changeset: aef6c726810e
Author:mullan
Date: 2013-12-23 14:03 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/aef6c726810e
8030813: Signed applet fails to load when CRLs are stored in an LDAP directory
Summary: Skip JNDI application resource lookup to avoid recursive JAR
Hi Mandy, after some trials i could simulate the failure again (now with
UEH in place), however the UEH now cannot print enough details as it
also tries to allocate memory, when it does Thread.getName()(it
internally creates a String object), printStackTrace() also creates new
On 12/23/2013 2:02 PM, srikalyan chandrashekar wrote:
Hi Mandy, after some trials i could simulate the failure again (now
with UEH in place), however the UEH now cannot print enough details as
it also tries to allocate memory, when it does Thread.getName()(it
internally creates a String
It looks like this could be rearranged to
long result = first * radix + second;
int guard = radix * (int) (first 57);
if (guard = 128 || (result = 0 guard = 128 - Character.MAX_RADIX)) {
…
provided reasonable comments were added. I understand the first part of this
conditional, guard = 128,
We have
first/0x1p57 - 1 JAVA{first57} JAVA{first57} = first/0x1p57.
Here JAVA{.} stands for Java expression with all its truncations and
wrappings.
Expressions without JAVA{.}are exact mathematical expressions.
JAVA{first57} = first/0x1p57 1p64/1p57 = 1p7, radix =
Character.MAX_RADIX = 36,
On 12/21/2013 8:50 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Is it possible to get the test output when it fails? It can fail in
two different ways. I can't look at the bug (not authorized)...
You should be able to look at it now. There isn't any other information
besides OOME error.
Exception:
Thanks Aleksej for addressing the ACT issue. The l10n files look fine to
me. I agree that we should work on translation consistency issues
separately the next time we have a translation cycle.
thanks,
-michael
On 13?12?22? 10:14 ??, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hi,
The new version of patch for
Hi Stuart
I did an experiment that set a small thread stack size using the
-Xss228k or -Xss512k. The result is surprised that jtreg reports the
test passed. Although I can see the StackOverflowError showing in the
log even when I set thread stack size as 512k . So the problem is old
shell
Looks good to me.
Masayoshi
On 12/23/2013 3:14 AM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
Hi,
The new version of patch for TimeZone display names update is
available. Previous webrev contains incorrect naming for Acre timezone
generic name (ACT[] array) across all non-root locales. The name was
corrected
21 matches
Mail list logo
