On 04/10/2014 08:21 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Apr 9, 2014, at 2:21 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
On Apr 8, 2014, at 9:15 PM, Mike Duigou mike.dui...@oracle.com wrote:
That seems a terribly broken usage of UUID for 128 bit numbers or a pair of
signed 64 bit numbers :-)
On Apr 11, 2014, at 1:24 AM, Brian Burkhalter brian.burkhal...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hello,
This is a minor amplification of information already contained in the javadoc.
Issue:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035427
Patch:
Hello everybody!
ObjectStreamClass#forClass() function is allowed to return null, if the
local VM does not have the corresponding local class.
Because of that, NPE can be encountered during serialization through a
subclass of ObjectOutputStream.
Would you please help review the fix?
BUGURL:
On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Code that relies on UUIDs to have a natural order, say chronological, is
relying on being given the particular type of UUIDs that have the time
built-in. When given mixed-type or non-time-based UUIDs, such code
On 04/09/2014 03:20 PM, roger riggs wrote:
Hi Peter,
On a related topic, the request to be able to destroy a Process and
all of its children
might also want to used the group pid to be able to identify all of
the children.
Hi Roger,
This would require each child spawned by Process API to
Hi Jonathan,
thank you for fixing all the remaining issues. From my point of view this
change looks good now.
@Masayoshi: can I please get a final approval from you for pushing the
change? I also want to downport this to 8u-dev but I don't think that's a
big deal as this only touches AX code.
Hi Peter,
Understood, but didn't want ignore another requested feature.
Iterating over children is workable but I'm not clear whether if an
intermediate child
dies/is killed that its children are reparented up the tree.
If for one reason or another a grandchild is reparented to pid 1 then it
On 04/09/2014 07:02 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Peter Levart peter.lev...@gmail.com
mailto:peter.lev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Martin,
As you might have seen in my later reply to Roger, there's still
hope on that front: setpgid() + wait(-pgid, ...)
On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
Does such a non-normative change require a CCC? I think the changes could be
placed under an @apiNote tag.
Personally I would think not but was prepared to submit one.
It's a shame that java.util.Random is explicitly
On Apr 11, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Brian Burkhalter brian.burkhal...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
Does such a non-normative change require a CCC? I think the changes could be
placed under an @apiNote tag.
Personally I would think
On 04/11/2014 04:45 PM, roger riggs wrote:
Hi Peter,
Understood, but didn't want ignore another requested feature.
Iterating over children is workable but I'm not clear whether if an
intermediate child
dies/is killed that its children are reparented up the tree.
If a parent dies, all it's
Hi Peter,
We do know the PIDs of the processes that we care about but are unwilling
to pay the cost of waiting for them individually.
For the escapees, Process could resort to an individual thread invoking
waitpid(n).
Thanks, Roger
On 4/11/2014 10:52 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 04/09/2014
Hello all;
This is a simple cleanup changeset that removes redundant initialization of
fields to null from a number of collection classes. These field initializations
may seem cheap but they do have a cost:
- For volatile fields there is a measurable cost on some benchmarks for these
extra
Overall it looks ok.
I think you will get some unchecked warnings from
com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/xpointer/XPointerHandler.java
Any reason not to address this for your HashMap and ArrayList?
Best
Lance
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java
Looks fine mike
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 11, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Mike Duigou mike.dui...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello all;
This is a simple
On 04/11/2014 11:22 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035284
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8035284/0/webrev/
This! Thumbs up.
Redundant null initializations in other components/packages will be handled
in separate issues.
I also remember seeing
Apparently javac did at elide the extraneous null initialization at one point
and it was deemed to have been contrary to point #4 of the procedure in JLS
12.5
(http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-12.html#jls-12.5-220-D)
Mike
On Apr 11 2014, at 12:57 , Martin Buchholz
This look good to me. I'm really happy to see these do away. I'll help clean up
other areas too.
-Chris
On 11 Apr 2014, at 20:22, Mike Duigou mike.dui...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello all;
This is a simple cleanup changeset that removes redundant initialization of
fields to null from a
On 11 Apr 2014, at 21:04, Mike Duigou mike.dui...@oracle.com wrote:
Apparently javac did at elide the extraneous null initialization at one
point and it was deemed to have been contrary to point #4 of the procedure in
JLS 12.5
I and others have tried to track down the compiler issue in which this change
was made. If anyone can point us in the right direction it would be nice to
reference that issue.
Mike
On Apr 11 2014, at 13:09 , Chris Hegarty chris.hega...@oracle.com wrote:
On 11 Apr 2014, at 21:04, Mike
On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:09 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
On Apr 11, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Brian Burkhalter brian.burkhal...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Paul Sandoz paul.san...@oracle.com wrote:
Does such a non-normative change require a CCC? I think the
Hi,
Please help review this changeset to upgrade the zip filesystem provider
implementation from
demo to a supported provider.
Back in JDK7 we created a demo file system provider for zip/jar files.
It is shipped in two forms,
one as a binary under lib/ext that works out of the box to support
Hi Lance,
Good catch. I have uploaded a fixed review. I had forgotten about this
since Xerces is at JDK 1.4, while we had agreed to move to JDK 1.7.
It's good to get these lint warnings fixed now since we are planning to
do a large scale fix later on. I also made a similar fix in
Hi David,
Looks better. You should be able to clean this up further by using the diamond
operator. Once you do this, you are good to go.
Best
Lance
On Apr 11, 2014, at 7:09 PM, David Li david.x...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Lance,
Good catch. I have uploaded a fixed review. I had forgotten
On 4/11/2014 3:42 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sherman/8038500/webrev
It's good to see the source of the zip provider moved to the jdk repo.
You have made some public classes to package-private which is good. I
wonder whether a few remaining public classes
Got it, updated. Same place:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dli/8037259/webrev/
Thanks,
David
On 4/11/2014 4:21 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi David,
Looks better. You should be able to clean this up further by using
the diamond operator. Once you do this, you are good to go.
Best
Lance
On
+1
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 11, 2014, at 7:48 PM, David Li david.x...@oracle.com wrote:
Got it, updated. Same place:
27 matches
Mail list logo
