Thank you Paul for your review!
On 13.07.2015 12:57, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On Jul 12, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Ivan Gerasimov ivan.gerasi...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello!
There's a minor issue in the current implementation of Pattern.quote() with
possible numeric overflow when calculating initial capacity
On Jul 12, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Ivan Gerasimov ivan.gerasi...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello!
There's a minor issue in the current implementation of Pattern.quote() with
possible numeric overflow when calculating initial capacity of StringBuilder.
With the fix, some slight optimizations were done
Hi Tagir,
Thanks for looking at this. Judging by the results i am guessing your
measurements were performed on a 4-core system.
My initial inclination for these scenarios is it is likely better for the
developer to split the execution in two parts. The first part, low N and low Q,
is to
Hi
Stefan, thanks.
See below for a patch to the documentation of all abstract spliterators.
Paul.
diff -r a3175de2e354 src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Spliterators.java
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Spliterators.java Tue Jun 09
07:10:03 2015 +0100
+++
Hi all,
I would like to know what happened to '(Review ID: 9055455) - RFE: Intristics
for asin, acos'. I made report on http://bugreport.java.com/. Is it under
evaluation or bugreport.java.com is only black hole as somebody complained?
Thank you for info
Martin
Forwarding this contribution from Ahmed to core-libs-dev alias as the
change is going to be in jdk/java.scripting/javax.script code.
PS. I'll send out webrev after build, test.
Thanks Ahmed,
-Sundar
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [PATCH]
Build changes look fine.
/Magnus
10 jul 2015 kl. 05:50 skrev Henry Jen henry@oracle.com:
Sigh, forgot the link to the webrev again.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/jdk9/8027634/webrev/
Cheers,
Henry
On Jul 9, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Henry Jen henry@oracle.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Daniel,
please help to review the change for 8129833.
Issue:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129833
Patch:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/felix/8129833/
The patch add a new class to try rmic with. It covers a problem of locating the
class java.awt.Panel in jigsaw
Hello!
Thank you for the detailed answer.
PS Thanks for looking at this. Judging by the results i am guessing
PS your measurements were performed on a 4-core system.
Yes, quad-core, I mentioned it before.
PS My initial inclination for these scenarios is it is likely better
PS for the developer
I agree that normalizedD looks like a typo (but it probably was not), but
normalized is too ambiguous (there are too many different kinds of
normalization) so a precise term like NFD should be used. Maybe we should
add a reference to http://unicode.org/reports/tr15/
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:29
looks good.
On 07/12/2015 09:32 AM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
There's a minor issue in the current implementation of Pattern.quote() with
possible numeric overflow when calculating initial capacity of StringBuilder.
With the fix, some slight optimizations were done and a few typos were
On 07/12/2015 02:01 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
RegExTest fails sometimes in checking Boyer-Moore search.
This is because it was assumed that after insertion a pattern into a string at
some position, we'll find it at the same position.
That's not true if we insert 'aa' into 'xxaxx' at
Please review a testbug to correctly look for destroyed processes.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-isalive-8130877/
Issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130877
Thanks, Roger
Thanks Martin!
On 13.07.2015 21:26, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I agree that normalizedD looks like a typo (but it probably was not),
but normalized is too ambiguous (there are too many different kinds
of normalization) so a precise term like NFD should be used. Maybe we
should add a reference to
@see is mostly obsolete, now that we can use
{@linkplain java.text.Normalizer.Form.NFD NFD}
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Ivan Gerasimov ivan.gerasi...@oracle.com
wrote:
Thanks Martin!
On 13.07.2015 21:26, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I agree that normalizedD looks like a typo (but it
Hello,
Please review the fix for 8032446 to support Unicode 7 in JDK 9.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032446
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~peytoia/8032446/webrev.00/
- Internal review for both open closed parts has been completed.
- Changes in sun.text.* packages are mostly porting
16 matches
Mail list logo