RE: RFR [XS] : 8175000 : jexec fails to execute simple helloworld.jar

Hello, probably I should add the info that the fix is needed in jdk9 as well , not only jdk10 . Without the fix jdk9/10show this error when executing a small example jar : /myjdk9/images/jdk/lib/jexec /java_test/hellojar/helloworld.jar invalid file (bad magic number): Exec format e

Re: [10] RFR: 8168664 [JAXP] XALAN: xsl:element generates namespace prefixes if namespace is given as URI only

Hello, Yes, as Joe (Wang) stated, we are working on bringing up the CSR process for JDK 10 so we aren't ready to accept proposals quite yet. Thanks, -Joe On 2/22/2017 1:16 PM, huizhe wang wrote: Hi Christoph, I totally understand the desire to get it out of your backlog. However, we do n

Re: RFR 8175360 Error in Collectors.averagingXXX Java Doc

+1 -Aleksey On 02/22/2017 10:19 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: > Hi > > Please review this small documentation fix to the averaging functions on > java.util.stream.Collectors. > > Paul. > > diff -r 29059b8ecc7f > src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Collectors.java > --- a/src/java.base/shar

RFR 8175360 Error in Collectors.averagingXXX Java Doc

Hi Please review this small documentation fix to the averaging functions on java.util.stream.Collectors. Paul. diff -r 29059b8ecc7f src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Collectors.java --- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Collectors.java Tue Feb 21 05:58:23 2017 -08

Re: [10] RFR: 8168664 [JAXP] XALAN: xsl:element generates namespace prefixes if namespace is given as URI only

Hi Christoph, I totally understand the desire to get it out of your backlog. However, we do need a compatibility review for this change. The details for JDK 10 Compatibility & Specification Review are still in the works. It's unfortunate that we do have to wait a bit. Please refer to http://m

RFR: jsr166 jdk? integration wave ?

We half promised "no more jdk9 changes", but ... http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-jdk9-integration/ as usual, I think they should go into jdk9, but y'all probably tell me it's too late (and that's OK; we can retarget for jdk10) There's only one line of production code c

RFR [XS] : 8175000 : jexec fails to execute simple helloworld.jar

Hello , when looking into the jexec build I noticed that execution of a simple helloworld.jar with jexec does not work any more. I did a little patch for this which adjusted the addition done with CR 8156478: 3 Buffer overrun defect groups in jexec.c

Re: [10] RFR: 8175233: Remove LambdaForm.debugName

Nice cleanup, Claes! Reviewed. Best regards, Vladimir Ivanov On 2/20/17 5:24 PM, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, the LambdaForm.debugName field is useful for debugging, but names are generated and retained in this field also for production code, which is then used to name generated methods and class

Re: [10] RFR: 8175233: Remove LambdaForm.debugName

On 2017-02-22 07:20, John Rose wrote: On Feb 20, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Claes Redestad wrote: the LambdaForm.debugName field is useful for debugging, but names are generated and retained in this field also for production code, which is then used to name generated methods and classes. Reviewed.