Hi Roger,
is it necessary to add the bug id to OnExitTest?
-Felix
On 2017/7/19 2:46, Roger Riggs wrote:
Please review a fix for an intermittent failure in the ProcessHandle
OnExitTest
that fails frequently on Solaris.
ProcessHandle.isAlive is using /proc/pid/psinfo to determine if a
pro
Hello,
Please review this small fix to the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183902
The proposed fix is located at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8183902/webrev.00/
This is a leftover fix to 8160199. With the fix to 8160199, there is no
need to supplement the lan
Hi Thomas,
Yes, if there is no access to the pid, then it can't report alive or
not, and assume not.
If there access restrictions it will apply to the waitid/waitpid in the
waitForProcessExit0
logic also and the answer will be at least consistent (and avoid a
possible race
between //proc/pid/
Hi Roger,
I think this may fail if you have no permission to send a signal to that
process. In that case, kill(2) may yield EPERM and isAlive may return false
even though the process is alive.
But then, I am not sure if that could happen in that particular scenario,
plus it may also mean that you
Please review a fix for an intermittent failure in the ProcessHandle
OnExitTest
that fails frequently on Solaris.
ProcessHandle.isAlive is using /proc/pid/psinfo to determine if a
process is alive and it's start time.
However, it appears that the between the process exiting and the reaping
of
> On 17 Jul 2017, at 16:51, Andrey Nazarov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you review simple test fix?
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~anazarov/JDK-8177357/webrev.00/webrev
>
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177357
>
Looks ok. (It bothers me that deletion of a directory is so fragi
After a long delay, we are finally ready to try again to get in jsr166
jdk10 integration wave 1.
The set of changes has grown a lot over the past few months (too much?),
and contains the usual hard-to-review tck test improvements. Our
infrastructure for generating these commits has changed a lot
On 07/18/2017 04:59 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
+1
Thanks!
* the test needs a bugid before pushing.
Will do.
/Claes
+1
* the test needs a bugid before pushing.
On 7/18/17, 7:16 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi Sherman,
On 07/14/2017 07:42 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi Claes,
The change looks fine.
The only concern is that, in theory, it appears we no longer have any
"check"
to guarantee that all "alias" names
Hi Sherman,
On 07/14/2017 07:42 PM, Xueming Shen wrote:
Hi Claes,
The change looks fine.
The only concern is that, in theory, it appears we no longer have any
"check"
to guarantee that all "alias" names defined for these 3 charsets
indeed follow
the spec? The consequence of this is that some
Hi Bob,
VMWare has the option to install additional tools, in case they are
installed you get a number of metrics
from the guests. Some info can be found here :
https://www.vmware.com/support/developer/guest-sdk/
Running in the guests you would load libvmGuestLib.so / vmGuestLib.dll
> On Jul 17, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Bob Vandette wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 14, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Volker Simonis
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bob,
>>>
>>> thanks for starting this JEP. I think it is long overdue and will be
>>> very helpful for ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
