> On Apr 4, 2018, at 10:47 AM, Vivek Theeyarath
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Please review.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8184692
>
> Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtheeyarath/8184692/webrev.00/
>
Like with your other
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 3:34 AM, Vivek Theeyarath
> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I have incorporated the changes as per the feedback and here is the
>>> updated webrev .
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rraghavan/8164781/webrev.02/ .
>>> Bug:
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 12:04 AM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Yet another HashMap that can be preallocated more accurately.
>
> Currently, the map is created as the following:
>// Initial capacity of # values is sufficient to avoid resizes
>
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Tony Printezis wrote:
> Would proposing to introduce thread exit hooks be reasonable? Or is
> everyone going to freak out? :-) The hooks can be either per-Thread or even
> per-ThreadLocal. And it's OK if the hooks can only be used within
Hi Tony,
On 6/04/2018 7:45 AM, Tony Printezis wrote:
Hi all,
We recently hit another interesting issue with the NIO thread-local
DirectByteBuffer cache. One of our services seems to create and drop
If it's in a ThreadLocal then aren't you just asking for thread-locals
to be cleared at
Hi all,
We recently hit another interesting issue with the NIO thread-local
DirectByteBuffer cache. One of our services seems to create and drop
threads at regular intervals. I assume this is due to a thread pool
dynamically resizing itself.
Let's say a thread starts, lives long enough for its
Thanks for review Claes!
On 4/5/18 6:03 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
looks ok, but the cost/benefit ration of adding a standalone
regression test for every
such inefficiency seems dubious to me. Could we group these together,
somewhere?
Yes, I agree that this kind of tests should be
Looks good, thanks for doing this!.
Kumar
On 4/4/2018 5:09 PM, Andrey Nazarov wrote:
On 22 Mar 2018, at 07:18, Kumar Srinivasan
wrote:
David,
Why would the VM emit these warnings if the deprecated vm flag
is not being used ?
Andrey,
As for the reviews I am
The problem in this bug is that jimage file is mistakenly opened with
"inherit by child processes" flag. In our case, the child process is
started with Runtime.exec() and serves as updater that can also replace
embedded JRE. However, due to jimage ("lib/modules") file handle being
inherited,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/overview.html
8200728: Docs (Comparison of Stack and Deque methods) for Deque is not
correct' src/main/java/util/Deque.java
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/Deque-Stack/index.html
Hi,
Please review this jdk10 backport.
Original JDK 11 bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194554
Original JDK 11 fix:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/050352ed64d5
Please note the discussion in JBS comments about the issue. It seems to include
the more verbose
On 05/04/2018 14:42, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
since JDK-8073152 sun.nio.cs.FastCharsetProvider is unused and can be
removed.
Patch:
hg rm src/java.base/share/classes/sun/nio/cs/FastCharsetProvider.java
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201178
I don't see any references to it
Hi,
since JDK-8073152 sun.nio.cs.FastCharsetProvider is unused and can be
removed.
Patch:
hg rm src/java.base/share/classes/sun/nio/cs/FastCharsetProvider.java
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201178
Thanks!
/Claes
Hi Vivek,
Can we do something to make the first sentence less confusing?
How about:
* Creates a predicate that tests a given input string for a subsequence
that matches this pattern.
-or-
* Creates a predicate that tests if this pattern is found in a given
input string. Thanks, Roger
On
Hi,
looks ok, but the cost/benefit ration of adding a standalone regression
test for every
such inefficiency seems dubious to me. Could we group these together,
somewhere?
Bonus startup points if you rewrote so that AccessMode.values() is only
called once,
since it clones the backing
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have incorporated the changes as per the feedback and here is the
>> updated webrev .
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rraghavan/8164781/webrev.02/ .
>>Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164781
>>
>+1
Thanks Paul
>I know it’s picky, but would you mind sticking
Hi Roger,
The OpenJ9 VM implementation provides its own java.lang.System, which
performs similar type early-on VM initialization to the OpenJDK core
library classes. The basic reason for invoking the method is to initialize
the platform encoding either called from a related core library method,
Hello!
Yet another HashMap that can be preallocated more accurately.
Currently, the map is created as the following:
// Initial capacity of # values is sufficient to avoid resizes
// for the smallest table size (32)
methodNameToAccessMode = new
Hi Martin!
Ah bummer! Missing @modules java.base/java.util:open in the test.
Sorry about that.
Let me fix it with the fix for a similar issue JDK-8200788 that I've
just filed.
With kind regards,
Ivan
On 4/4/18 9:24 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Hi Ivan,
I'm seeing
[2018-04-04 20:56:11,999]
19 matches
Mail list logo