On 5/4/18 2:59 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Here's an update to the previously proposed patch for JEP 330: Launch
Single-File Source-Code Programs.
It includes all review feedback so far. The changes are mostly minor,
but with the addition of more test cases.
The webrev includes a
Will do.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2018, at 10:38 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
>
> A typical way to refer to a particular Unicode character by code point hex
> value is U+ (with more x's if necessary). For example,
>
> 2602 * Returns a string whose value
When we complete the (long) arc of Valhalla, making void a real type
will be highly desirable (for example, Consumer becomes a refinement
of Function). But that's a ways off.
On 5/9/2018 9:40 PM, James Roper wrote:
Hi all,
I'm interested in opinions on whether Java should have a
Hi all,
I'm interested in opinions on whether Java should have a unit type. I
apologise if this has already been discussed on this list before, I did
search for it but didn't find anything.
By unit type, I'm referring to a type that represents no value. When a
Java method returns no value, void
A typical way to refer to a particular Unicode character by code point hex value
is U+ (with more x's if necessary). For example,
2602 * Returns a string whose value is this string, with all leading
2603 * and trailing space removed, where space is defined
2604 * as any
Does anyone know what is going to be decided
around full target status of JEP 306?
I have been recommended to this list for the sake
of this question.
?
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/306
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175916
> On May 10, 2018, at 6:49 AM, Vincent Ryan wrote:
>
>>
>> - As Max observes, being able to supply the delimiters might be a good
>> addition. (I'm thinking IP addresses too).
>
> Sure. Add another toHexString method that takes a delimiter character?
Good idea.
Thanks for your comments Max.
> On 9 May 2018, at 03:34, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
> Nice tool.
>
> However, I am not sure how toFormattedHexString() and toPrintableString() are
> useful, seems only for providing a customizable dump format which is,
> actually, not very
Thanks Roger for your comments.
The main motivator for this class is to provide a basic hex. encoder/decoder
for smaller amounts of binary data
and to provide a hexdump encoder for larger amounts of binary data, while
recognising the need to cater for
custom formats too.
The class does not
Time to do this, since Claes is also touching ArrayList.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/overview.html
8202685: Improve ArrayList replaceAll
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/jdk/jsr166-integration/replaceAll/index.html
Hi Vinnie,
On the API and spec, a few comments:
- Expanding the printable string from ASCII to ISO-8859-1 would make
it a bit more useful in more cases.
That might suggest using the Charset converter to do the work (less
optimized but more functional).
- There is no API support for
Hi Hamlin,
Looks good,
Thanks, Roger
On 5/7/2018 10:17 PM, Hamlin Li wrote:
Would you please review the following patch?
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202756
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mli/8202756/webrev.00/
Thank you
-Hamlin
Any volunteers from core-libs and/or hotspot?
Thank you,
Alexey
On 02/05/2018 13:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Looks good to me, FWIW.
/Magnus
2 maj 2018 kl. 13:52 skrev Alexey Ivanov :
Hi,
Could you please review the following fix for jdk11?
bug:
This feature introduces three String instance methods for removal of white
space from the beginning and end of a string. Unlike String::trim, these
methods use the Unicode definition of white space. Specifically, these methods
use Character.isWhitespace(int codePoint) to detect space
I'll work up a new version of the webrev that addresses your feedback,
and strip down the mockfx classes to the minimum needed to support the
test cases.
-- Kevin
On 5/8/2018 3:52 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Please review the following test fix:
This seems like better mailing list for this inquiry.
Coleen
On 5/9/18 6:43 AM, A Z wrote:
Does anyone know what is going to be decided
around full target status of JEP 306?
I have been recommended to this list for the sake
of this question.
?
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/306
Thanks a lot for digging this up. Interesting, so the implementation
"leaked" into the API after all.
Sometimes I wish that it would be possible for an implementation to
"capture" a wildcard in a local type variable, as such:
void foo(List list) {
List local = list;
17 matches
Mail list logo