> On Nov 23, 2019, at 11:45 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 23, 2019, at 11:22 AM, Kevin Rushforth
>> wrote:
>>
>> I just tried this and it worked fine for me:
>>
>> jpackage --java-options '-Djava.security.policy=$APPDIR/all.policy' ...
>>
>> (note that there should not be an e
On 25/11/2019 8:45 am, David Holmes wrote:
On 25/11/2019 7:49 am, David Holmes wrote:
On 25/11/2019 7:33 am, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On 23/11/2019 12:04 am, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to push this change. However, running it through jdk-submit
shows reproducible erro
On 25/11/2019 7:49 am, David Holmes wrote:
On 25/11/2019 7:33 am, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On 23/11/2019 12:04 am, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to push this change. However, running it through jdk-submit
shows reproducible errors:
Job: mach5-one-clanger-JDK-8234185-1-2019
On 25/11/2019 7:33 am, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On 23/11/2019 12:04 am, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to push this change. However, running it through jdk-submit
shows reproducible errors:
Job: mach5-one-clanger-JDK-8234185-1-20191122-0927-6913189
BuildId: 2019-11-22-092637
Hi Christoph,
On 23/11/2019 12:04 am, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to push this change. However, running it through jdk-submit shows
reproducible errors:
Job: mach5-one-clanger-JDK-8234185-1-20191122-0927-6913189
BuildId: 2019-11-22-0926373.christoph.langer.source
No failed tests
Tas
OK, interesting. Your interpretation seems right; that getting the MH
is a big part of the expense of the LDC approach. Caching simulates
using Constant_MethodHandle_info, so that's a fair comparision. It's
not clear whether there's a performance difference getting the MH via
lookup (as your