On 8/8/20 10:30 AM, Ludovic Henry wrote:
Hi Andrew, Vladimir,
It's too early for that: changes are supposed to bake in JDK head for
a while. Also, since it's an enhancement rather than a bug fix we'd
need to have the discussion. I would say it's marginal whether
something like this should be ba
Hi Andrew, Vladimir,
> It's too early for that: changes are supposed to bake in JDK head for
> a while. Also, since it's an enhancement rather than a bug fix we'd
> need to have the discussion. I would say it's marginal whether
> something like this should be back ported.
> Usually we backport on
Hi Tagir,
Clearly I am a terribly tracker of null values! My apologies for the poor
review of that.
Regarding changing sub-map computeIfAbsent and compute behavior, yes that would
require a CSR.
Thinking more about this, it may be better to play it safe and retain the
current behavior for thi
On 8/8/20 5:30 AM, Ludovic Henry wrote:
> I would like to backport the newly added MD5 Intrinsic to JDK 11.
It's too early for that: changes are supposed to bake in JDK head for
a while. Also, since it's an enhancement rather than a bug fix we'd
need to have the discussion. I would say it's margi
Thanks Brian for pushing
On 2020-08-07 23:12, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
On Aug 7, 2020, at 9:39 AM, Brian Burkhalter
mailto:brian.burkhal...@oracle.com>> wrote:
There's one corner case that would not pass, however, so I added
testNegativeOffsetZeroLength() to exercise that. It passes on the n
Hello,
I would like to backport the newly added MD5 Intrinsic to JDK 11. The change is
contained, limiting the chance of a regression, and provides a great speedup on
a common pattern. This change also contains the follow-up fix by Vladimir
Kozlov.
As it is the first backport I go through, ple
