HI, Mandy
Thanks for the review, I took one day off yesterday so just got a detail look
of your reply.
On 8/19/20 1:30 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 8/17/20 12:37 PM, Yumin Qi wrote:
Hi, Ioi
Thanks for review/suggestion. I have updated the webrev at the following link:
http://cr.openjdk.jav
HI,
I hate pinging, but I would really appreciate it if someone finds the time to
take a look at my suggestion below from last week.
Or is this maybe the wrong mailing list - given that it is in the "sun" root
package?
Cheers,
Christoph
= ORIGINAL MAIL =
Hi,
I just stumbled upon sun
Hi Roger,
Thank you for your reply. I wasn't aware of this practice, and will get
to work on creating and contributing a test.
Regards,
- Corey
On 8/19/20 11:20 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Corey,
For changes obviously performance motivated, it is conventional to run a
JMH perf test to demo
Please review a java.util.Hex API to encode and decode hexadecimal
strings to and from byte arrays.
Within the JDK and JDK tests there are multiple implementations to
encode and decode
hexadecimal strings to byte arrays. Hex encoders and decoders support
upper or lower case hexadecimal charact
On 8/17/20 12:37 PM, Yumin Qi wrote:
Hi, Ioi
Thanks for review/suggestion. I have updated the webrev at the
following link:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~minqi/2020/8247536/webrev-02/
This patch leverages the TRACE_RESOLVE output and passes the trace
output to VM. VM then calls
Generate
Hi Naoto,
Looks good, thanks for the updates.
Roger
On 8/19/20 2:26 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Roger,
Thank you for your comments. I've addressed your suggestions and
created a new webrev below:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8251499/webrev.03/
Naoto
On 8/19/20 8:33 AM, Rog
Hi Roger,
Thank you for your comments. I've addressed your suggestions and created
a new webrev below:
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8251499/webrev.03/
Naoto
On 8/19/20 8:33 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Naoto,
CompactNumberFormat.java:
269: The field "placeHolders" should be named consi
Hi Corey,
For changes obviously performance motivated, it is conventional to run a
JMH perf test to demonstate
the improvement and prove it is worthwhile to add code complexity.
I don't see any existing Base64 JMH tests but they would be in the repo
below or near:
test/micro/org/openjdk/
Michihiro Horie posted up a new iteration of this webrev for me. This
time the webrev includes a complete implementation of the intrinsic for
Power9 and Power10.
You can find it here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mhorie/8248188/webrev.02/
Changes in webrev.02 vs. webrev.01:
* The method hea
Yes. Core library code close to the JVM in OpenJDK (that in the java.base
module, commonly that in java.lang.* close to that in hotspot) often assumes
implementation specifics of the JVM. The two are closely coupled. There are
other such implementation-specific contracts like @Stable, or “final
Hi Galder,
Thanks for doing the fix and the work verifying.
I also verified using a fence fixes the jcstress test. Similarly, I found I
could only reproduce the issue in HotSpot when running a test more like
ClassValue (the double checked locking pattern when publishing to a plan field)
with t
Looks fine Julia
On 8/18/20 1:02 PM, Julia Boes wrote:
Hi,
The two changes below still need to be reviewed. Any takers?
Cheers,
Julia
---
old/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/AbstractValidatingLambdaMetafactory.java2020-08-14
23:55:41.953638446 +0530
+++
new/src/java.base/sha
Hi Naoto,
CompactNumberFormat.java:
269: The field "placeHolders" should be named consistently with the
other holders of Patterns.
-> placeHolderPatterns
1632: missing space before ":"
2390: I'm not sure why the stream processing is preferable to a direct
forEach(...).
TestCompactPatte
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:19 PM Doug Lea wrote:
> Catching up...
>
> As implied in other posts, the minimal fix is to add a trailing release
> fence (using Unsafe?) to the constructor.
FYI I have sent an RFR with the proposed fix ^
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-Augu
Hi all,
I've created patch [1] to fix the ClassValue$ClassValueMap NPE bug in [2].
The bug has been discussed by other members in the list in thread [3].
The patch follows the simple fix suggested by Doug and others in that
exchange, e.g. [4]. That is, it adds a release fence
to ClassValue$Class
15 matches
Mail list logo