On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 17:42:27 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> I decided to show a complete static method in the example, so it could be
>> copied to user utility class as is. Not sure if it's reasonable to add
>> `assert cls.isRecord();` there. Also I don't know whether there's a
>> limitation on m
> I decided to show a complete static method in the example, so it could be
> copied to user utility class as is. Not sure if it's reasonable to add
> `assert cls.isRecord();` there. Also I don't know whether there's a
> limitation on max characters in the sample code. Probable a line break in
- Mail original -
> De: "Brian Goetz"
> À: "Remi Forax" , "Stephen Colebourne"
>
> Cc: "core-libs-dev"
> Envoyé: Samedi 24 Avril 2021 00:40:54
> Objet: Re: New Collections interface - Sized
>> This is basically Spliterator, an iterator + a size, with the iterator is
>> "push"
>> inste
- Mail original -
> De: "Stephen Colebourne"
> À: "core-libs-dev"
> Envoyé: Vendredi 23 Avril 2021 11:23:03
> Objet: New Collections interface - Sized
> Hi all,
> While a discussion on ReversibleCollection is going on, I'd like to
> raise the interface I've always found most missing from
This is basically Spliterator, an iterator + a size, with the iterator is "push" instead
of "pull" because it's more efficient.
In details a Spliterator is either
- an Iterable (with no SIZED characteristic)
- an Iterable + size (if SIZED and estimateSize() != Long.MAX_VALUE)
- an Iterable +
- Mail original -
> De: "Stephen Colebourne"
> À: "core-libs-dev"
> Envoyé: Samedi 24 Avril 2021 00:14:51
> Objet: Re: New Collections interface - Sized
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 23:07, Brian Goetz wrote:
>> >> Is there a compelling example of where this would be used by clients?
>> > He
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 23:07, Brian Goetz wrote:
> >> Is there a compelling example of where this would be used by clients?
> > Here are some examples:
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10988634/java-global-isempty-method
> Without passing judgment on the sort of dynamically typed programs t
Is there a compelling example of where this would be used by clients?
Here are some examples:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10988634/java-global-isempty-method
Without passing judgment on the sort of dynamically typed programs that
need a method like this, or wondering what monstrositie
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 17:08, Brian Goetz wrote:
> This has come up before. For example, during an early iteration of the
> Stream design, before parallelism entered the picture. The first
> scrawled-on-a-napkin prototype for streams was based on Iterator, and it took
> about a minute to real
On Apr 21, 2021, at 11:40 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> Sure, if you are using native code then you have the full power of JVM TI and
> JNI available. Project Panama is exploring how to restrict access to native
> code, I think too early to say how this might extend to JNI.
I looked at some of t
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 14:28:25 GMT, Philippe Marschall
wrote:
>> Implement three optimiztations for Reader.read(CharBuffer)
>>
>> * Add a code path for heap buffers in Reader#read to use the backing array
>> instead of allocating a new one.
>> * Change the code path for direct buffers in Reader#
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:47:55 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the changes for the subject issue. This has been suggested in
> a recent discussion thread for the JEP 400
> [[1](https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2021-March/075214.html)].
> A CSR has also been drafted, a
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:38:43 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Please review the changes for the subject issue. This has been suggested in
>> a recent discussion thread for the JEP 400
>> [[1](https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2021-March/075214.html)].
>> A CSR has also been draft
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:38:53 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
>> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>>
>> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:38:53 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
>> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>>
>> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:38:53 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
>> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>>
>> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
This has come up before. For example, during an early iteration of the
Stream design, before parallelism entered the picture. The first
scrawled-on-a-napkin prototype for streams was based on Iterator, and it
took about a minute to realize that we could do a much better job if we
had a slight
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:38:53 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
>> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>>
>> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Patrick
Patrick Concannon has updated the pu
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:44:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Ki
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:13:16 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Move makeXXXSpilterator from public (@hidden) to protected. No API ch
>
> Jim Laskey has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:44:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Ki
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:44:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Ki
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:44:30 GMT, Patrick Concannon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
> package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
>
> This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
>
> Ki
Hi,
Could someone please review the second half of my update for the `java.time`
package to make use of the `instanceof` pattern variable?
This PR was split into two parts due to the large number of files affected.
Kind regards,
Patrick
-
Commit messages:
- 8265746: Update java.
Hi all,
While a discussion on ReversibleCollection is going on, I'd like to
raise the interface I've always found most missing from the framework
- Sized
public interface Sized {
int size();
default boolean isEmpty() {
return size() == 0;
}
default boolean isNotEmpty() {
ret
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 07:33, Stuart Marks wrote:
> On 4/22/21 8:36 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Having these methods on Collection could lead to a situation where calling
> addFirst
> and then getFirst might result in getFirst returning a different element from
> what
> was passed to addFirs
27 matches
Mail list logo
