On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 03:22:18 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
> while some other Posix system might as explained in the man page
What manpage?
The POSIX specification for this does not allow for EINVAL being returned due
to alignment issues. That is an extra constraint imposed by macOS and which
makes
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 03:18:32 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> …d on macOS
>>
>> This patch simply round up the specified stack size to multiple of the
>> system page size.
>>
>> Test is trivial, simply run java with -Xss option against following code. On
>> MacOS, before the fix, running with
> …d on macOS
>
> This patch simply round up the specified stack size to multiple of the system
> page size.
>
> Test is trivial, simply run java with -Xss option against following code. On
> MacOS, before the fix, running with `-Xss159k` and `-Xss160k` would get
> `7183` and `649`
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 01:48:21 GMT, Henry Jen wrote:
>> …d on macOS
>>
>> This patch simply round up the specified stack size to multiple of the
>> system page size.
>>
>> Test is trivial, simply run java with -Xss option against following code. On
>> MacOS, before the fix, running with
> Make explicit illegal argument cases of Class.arrayType.
>
> Please also review the corresponding CSR:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268300
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add missing ending newline.
Make explicit illegal argument cases of Class.arrayType.
Please also review the corresponding CSR:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8268300
-
Commit messages:
- Add test file.
- Merge branch 'master' into 8268250
- 8268250: Class.arrayType() for a 255-d array throws
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 14:00:25 GMT, Maxim Kartashev
wrote:
>> Not an expert by my understanding is that the VM only deals with modified
>> UTF-8, as does JNI. So the incoming string should be modified-UTF8 IMO and
>> then converted to UTF16.
>>
>> That said, this is shared code being modified
On Sat, 8 May 2021 09:51:46 GMT, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
>> This improves the messages that are provided by
>> `AnnotationTypeMismatchException`s. The message provided by
>> AnnotationTypeMismatchExceptions is deliberately undefined such that this
>> should not break any contract.
>
>
On Fri, 7 May 2021 18:58:02 GMT, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
> If a type is changed from a type that can be a member of an annotation which
> is used in an array, changing it to a type that cannot be an array member
> will be treated as if the type is an annotation type. As a result, no
>
This change fixes a build error during the generation of
`ScopedMemoryAccess.java` when the sources are readonly, by using `cat a > b`
instead of `cp a b` to avoid propagating the permissions to the generated
source.
-
Commit messages:
- 8268296: ScopedMemoryAccess build error
10 matches
Mail list logo