On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
I read through [these
posts](http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/2013-June/thread.html#1910)
and while I did see good reaso
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
To reiterate: These issues were explored in the JSR 335 EG and it was agreed
that this abstraction did not carry its weight. In any case, it is prematur
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 01:07:10 GMT, Brian Goetz wrote:
> I understand what you are proposing. I do not believe Streamable carries its
> weight.
That argument seems subjective. Could you elaborate on that in an objective
manner?
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5050
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
I understand what you are proposing. I do not believe Streamable carries its
weight.
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 14, 2021, at 8:53 PM, CC007 ***@**
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
Changed the title, since it seemed to cause confusion.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5050
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 15:13:39 GMT, Brian Goetz wrote:
> I object to this change. These issues were explored in the JSR 335 EG and it
> was agreed that this abstraction did not carry its weight. In any case, it is
> premature to bring a PR for a significant API change that has not been
> discuss
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
I object to this change. These issues were explored in the JSR 335 EG and it
was agreed that this abstraction did not carry its weight. In any case, i
Starting with a PR is not the way to add significant API surface to the JDK.
You have to first build consensus on the mailing list for the design concept
before we start talking about code.
FTR, Interfaces like these were already discussed and rejected in the JSR 335
design discussions.
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 00:53:06 GMT, liach
wrote:
> Aren't all iterable implementations effectively streamable if they properly
> implement `spliterator`? And the spliterator implementation can always be
> sequential or parallel, dependent on how you feed it into `StreamSupport`.
Yes indeed, but
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
The name of this pull request is a bit wrong, but it had to be the same as the
JBS name.
The interfaces don't make the Iterable have stream and parall
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
Hi Rick,
I do not think that such interfaces are a good addition to the JDK,
we do not want to promote the fact that you can create a Stream from an
Ite
11 matches
Mail list logo
