The commit here is a potential fix for the issue noted in
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8258117.
The change here repurposes an existing internal interface `ModuleInfoEntry` to
keep track of the last modified timestamp of a `module-info.class` descriptor.
This commit uses the
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 16:30:29 GMT, Ian Graves wrote:
>> Relaxing some assertion bounds to allow for small error values that still
>> show improvement over previous summation method.
>
> Ian Graves has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
On Sun, 12 Sep 2021 14:03:42 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> The commit in this PR implements the proposal for enhancement that was
>> discussed in the core-libs-dev mailing list recently[1], for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231640
>>
>> At a high level - the `store()` APIs in
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:23:52 GMT, Masanori Yano wrote:
> Could you please review the 8233674 bug fixes?
> This problem is caused by the antivirus software opening the file for a short
> time, so CreateFile() should be retried.
This will need discussion as to whether the JDK should put in retry
Hello Stuart,
On 10/09/21 11:12 pm, Stuart Marks wrote:
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Properties.java line 832:
830: * {@code #} character, the current date and time (formatted using the
831: * {@code EEE MMM dd HH:mm:ss zzz } {@link DateTimeFormatter date
format}),
> The commit in this PR implements the proposal for enhancement that was
> discussed in the core-libs-dev mailing list recently[1], for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231640
>
> At a high level - the `store()` APIs in `Properties` have been modified to
> now look for the
On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 08:08:33 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> Update code checks both non-null and instance of a class in java.naming
> module classes.
> The checks and explicit casts could also be replaced with pattern matching
> for the instanceof operator.
> For example:
> The following
On 11/09/2021 5:24 am, kabutz wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:08:05 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
This looks good. @cl4es might want to confirm that change was not intentional.
Completely unintentional, and perplexing since it's not a simple copy-paste
error..
The thread priorities in Java
